• schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Until a flood of TikTok users bankrupt them, anyways.

    Not entirely sure how you’d make the economics of hosting endless video files work without great big piles of money and some way to get even more big piles of money on a routine basis :/

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Yeah, video hosting is notoriously expensive. It’s why there’s still not a real competitor to YouTube, because nobody else but Google could afford to run the platform at a net loss for the amount of time required to build a profitable user base.

      If even a tiny percentage of TikTok’s US user base decided to move to Loops, that may be enough traffic to not only completely disable Loops, but would probably impact the rest of the Fediverse at large, too.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            Yet none of them really paywall you for using an adblocker.

            Actually come to think of it, porn sites are the only place I allow ads (obv blocking the pop ups and other dark pattern fuckery)… probablys because I learned to ignore them entirely as a teen before ad blockers existed.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        They can. And if at any point it becomes untenable, you can just archive whatever you host, shut down your instance, and put the videos up for download somewhere.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          I think this could lead to bigger activity pub instances collecting revenue for allowing company owned instances to federate. aka ad revenue.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            Could you explain that idea in more detail? I’m not really sure I understand how that would work in practice.

            • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              Private instance for company/creator: Hey, can we federate with your instance?

              Large public instance: pay me.

        • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          If a company is going bankrupt as a result of hosting a video service, they’re not hoping to be able to afford to archive and make it available for download either.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Not entirely sure how you’d make the economics of hosting endless video files work without great big piles of money

      You’re absolutely right, which is why BitTorrent never managed to take off. Totally unviable, doesn’t work at all, and definitely isn’t the technology underpinning federated video services like PeerTube.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        At one point BitTorrent/P2P was responsible for something like 30-40% of all global internet traffic.

        The thing is the protocol never really developed beyond some useful, but minor evolutionary updates.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          You say “never really developed beyond” as if that isn’t a synonym for “finished and working fine.”