• chaitae3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was about to ask, what’s with the privacy policy of that site? How can a website that focuses on an oppressed minority be so shitty about their personal data?

      I’m not telling your community what to do, but this seems very unsafe und unwise to use.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh, last time I saw only Florida had that dubious distinction. They’ve been busy. It’s infuriating what a shithole a large portion of this country has become.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have a trans teenage cousin in Texas. We’re not close, but I worry. All I can really do is let him and his mom know I exist in a “safe” state and hope they reach out if they decide to leave.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I live in TX and see lots of trans people living their lives. It’s a much more purple area though, but we still have a lot of crazies

      • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, lots of trans people live in Texas and Florida, that’s exactly what is terrifying about these laws - there are real victims.

  • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Trans identity supersedes all law, or medical context, or any other bullshit justification for dehumanizing anyone experiencing any form of Gender Dysphoria.

    You as a person reading this have value. Just by your very sentience you have worth. You are loved.

    We will overcome this moment in our history eventually, we may not all live to see it happen but we will. I know that’s an atom of relief in a sea of pain. Don’t let this bullshit dim your shine.

    I love each and every one of you.

  • JonEFive@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Some of us remember the coed bathroom featured on the hit 90s show Ally McBeal. It seemed like a progressive but not so far fetched idea at the time. So WTF are we doing still arguing about this 25 years later? These bathroom nazis need to get a grip.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed. I’ve never cared what the person who uses my bathroom at home has between their legs. Why should I care in a public bathroom?

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The real answer. Skip the whole gender thing if it’s an issue. Certainly public restrooms being ungendered entirely won’t be a problem, who knows why we have it this way…

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        who knows why we have it this way…

        The answer is sexism. When women started to enter the workforce there was concern that they would get “overwhelmed”, so gendered bathrooms were created to give them a space they could go to that feels like the home.

          • yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, bathrooms are a fairly modern invention that evolved from outhouses, which are gender neutral, or chamberpots, which are generally made specifically for one person. The invention of the modern bathroom with indoor plumbing came about in large, male only factories, and then a new environment, the restaraunt.

  • felix@pnw.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Any allies game to go to the mayor’s office and conduct a shit-in?

    Can’t legally use a bathroom? Let’s go on the floor.

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There should be a name for this. “The constituent letter” or “The Pelosi kiss” or maybe “The MAGA crayon.”

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can legally shit in any room. I even have a card somewhere licensing me to do so. My shits are the stankiest. I can’t make it to Odessa until 11/1 (i have an appointment today) but I will gladly drop a deuce directly in his office.

      • Aeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “PROVE, THAT YOU HAVE THE STRENGTH AND COURAGE, TO BE FREE” They said, shitting on the floor

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Each and every one of those fuckers looks like they’re in a retail store about to demand to speak to someone’s manager.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    While the bounty is set to a minimum of $10,000, there is no cap on how large the bounty can be.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A bounty on trans people? So I get paid by the state to catch 'em and turn 'em in so they can be issued their ‘up to $500 fine’? How cost ineffective.

    Ah, it’s misinformation and done so poorly, in an attempt to dramatise, they used the wrong word.

    So, the $10,000 is actually for lawsuits and can start there if anyone found guilty of the crime had also caused damages. That’s very normal for laws of people being somewhere they’ve been told not to be and damaging stuff. Like if I break the toilet seat I’m standing on while peering over the top of the cubicle to watch a girl pee.

    It’s articles like this that do not help a cause at all.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/odessa-tx-just-put-10000-bounties

      As far as I can see, the article doesn’t misrepresent this law. It says that anyone has standing to sue a trans person for using a gender-appropriate bathroom, and the damages of at least $10,000 would be awarded if the trans person lost the lawsuit. Normally, as I understand it, you wouldn’t have standing unless someone’s activity had probably harmed you, but by waiving this the door is open for the trans person’s use of a bathroom to be judged harmful in itself. So, a bounty on trans people.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is in a similar legal realm as the abortion bounty. There are a lot of legal experts who claim that there is no standing, while the conservative judges have held that it is a harm against society at large. So any member of society has standing.

        It’s a twisted and dangerous legal framework to establish. It’s already been used to attack the second amendment as well. It’s not good for any political side.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The 10k is the statuatory minimum and its paid from the person just trying to take a piss to the psychopath policing who can piss where who was not in any way damaged. It is not at all normal to pay random people out of the pockets of those breaking the law.

      In this case it encourages bigots to attack trans people trying to pee by allowing them to legally rob them if they catch them.

      Worse it encourages such attacks whichever bathroom they use. Dress like a girl use the womans room get attacked for using the wrong bathroom, use the mens room get attacked for being a woman in the means room.

      Using the bounty as a method of enforcement exists because the law is deemed likely unlawful. It exists explicitly to stop a pre emptive lawsuit against the government to stop enforcement.