Just because you haven’t seen a thing, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You really shouldn’t have gotten on this far without having had this explained to you by now- but here we are.
Are you ten years old? What is this petty squabbling?
If you don’t believe him you can either A. prove him wrong, or B. express your doubt. You don’t get to whine and cry until he does the research you want. That’s not how any of this works.
Okay man. Look. I’m not here to entertain your 3rd degree over something that doesn’t require it. If I’m lying, it’s a dumb thing to lie about. If I’m telling the truth, you believing me isn’t something that holds any value to me, so….
You’re going to have to find someone to pay you your attention elsewhere. I’m not that guy.
Let’s have some fun and test my theory to see if I’m right. The fun lies in the idea that either you’ll respond- proving me correct, or in an effort to prove me wrong- you won’t and I’ll have found a way out of this obnoxiously pointless interrogation of yours.
As an outsider in this discussion, who just read it now, what are you talking about??
You got 1 single question: show some examples of people being positive about AI/OpenAI on lemmy, something you said is very common. The one asking about it even did their best to find them themselves, but can’t, so is asking you since you seem to come across it all the time.
And then you’re like “i don’t owe you anything, and i’ll reply 50 times to you, but not take the minute it should take me to give a single example of what i was talking about (something i say is/was very common here)”…
If there’s someone looking bad in this situation, it’s you dude… The question communist asked is very normal in an honest discussion, and even more so after he did the effort to find it himself, and showed he did the effort.
If there’s this pro AI community on lemmy, plenty of people would love to see it and maybe see what their views are. It sounds genuinely interesting if it exists, but for some reason you mention it, and when someone asks “where are these posts? i did my best finding them, but can’t”, you’re like “no, stop harrassing me, i said it exists, but i’m not going to show you”.
Now i don’t know much about the users here, so could be he’s a troll. But i don’t see him as trolling you in this discussion, he asked a good faith question, and you go completely off the rails…
The proof that would be required would be you calling out openai and people defending them. I mean, that’s just blindingly obvious you know. The few times i referenced something i did in the past in a discussion, i linked my previous posts showing that, otherwise i could claim anything. It just seems like the most basic etiquette in a discussion. You said people were defending openAI here on lemmy when you were calling them out. And now people are curious about this and you’re like “i’ll never show you”.
I really don’t get how that’s so difficult for you. Great that you saw the openai bullshit coming from a mile away, but that doesn’t mean you have to act this ridiculous when someone is curious to the context and asks you for an example when they did the effort to find such an example and couldn’t…
There was no good faith whatsoever in the question, because the answer is irrelevant to the topic. Dude is fishing for a debate and chose this hill to plant a flag.
He’s now responding to my comment on this discussion, as he has in others where I wasn’t even talking to him. Do you need more reason why I won’t bother with this clown?
Just because you haven’t seen a thing, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You really shouldn’t have gotten on this far without having had this explained to you by now- but here we are.
I’m not going to argue with you about it.
Yeah but it certainly doesn’t mean it does exist just because you said so.
Something stinks.
Are you ten years old? What is this petty squabbling?
If you don’t believe him you can either A. prove him wrong, or B. express your doubt. You don’t get to whine and cry until he does the research you want. That’s not how any of this works.
I did prove him wrong, I searched his entire post history and found nothing.
I even volunteered to do it for him in multiple posts.
see: https://lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz/post/51512808/16473279
https://lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz/post/51512808/16473329
The post going through his post history was removed by mods. Check the modlog, he’s lying.
So, I dunno what you’re on about.
He’s lying. About his experience on Lemmy about AI.
Okay, dude.
He is.
It’s really pathetic, I agree.
If he wasn’t an asshole, I wouldn’t have bothered checking, but he was, so, I did, you can perform the same test yourself to verify.
ai posts with 0 upvotes start here: https://lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz/search?q=ai&type=All&listingType=All&creatorId=18756960&page=5&sort=TopAll
I know you are but what am I?
Okay man. Look. I’m not here to entertain your 3rd degree over something that doesn’t require it. If I’m lying, it’s a dumb thing to lie about. If I’m telling the truth, you believing me isn’t something that holds any value to me, so….
You’re going to have to find someone to pay you your attention elsewhere. I’m not that guy.
That’s exactly what a liar would say, just saying.
edit: I searched your post history… you’ve never had a comment mentioning AI go into the negatives.
the closest was this:
in which you were being an asshole…
there’s also this
which was nonsense…
You are actually lying about this… and it’s a very weird thing to do. Really dumb thing to lie about.
Mods deleted proof that there’s nothing like that in their post history for some reason even though anyone can do it
go to their profile, search ai, sort by upvotes, find nothing resembling what they’re saying
Do you think this is my only social media account?
Seriously man, I really hope you find the attention you so desperately crave.
i said on lemmy twice. Goalpost shifted.
You just have to have the last word, don’t you?
Let’s have some fun and test my theory to see if I’m right. The fun lies in the idea that either you’ll respond- proving me correct, or in an effort to prove me wrong- you won’t and I’ll have found a way out of this obnoxiously pointless interrogation of yours.
I win either way.
Weird that you bothered to write that… odd coping mechanism for being called out for lying.
would’ve been less effort to give an example.
Thanks for playing.
FWIW, you do not seem interested in an honest discussion, merely arguing in bad faith or trolling.
FWIW, I don’t feel I need to answer to a pointless barrage of questions.
Also FWIW, I don’t give a fuck what it’s worth you you.
As an outsider in this discussion, who just read it now, what are you talking about??
You got 1 single question: show some examples of people being positive about AI/OpenAI on lemmy, something you said is very common. The one asking about it even did their best to find them themselves, but can’t, so is asking you since you seem to come across it all the time.
And then you’re like “i don’t owe you anything, and i’ll reply 50 times to you, but not take the minute it should take me to give a single example of what i was talking about (something i say is/was very common here)”…
If there’s someone looking bad in this situation, it’s you dude… The question communist asked is very normal in an honest discussion, and even more so after he did the effort to find it himself, and showed he did the effort.
If there’s this pro AI community on lemmy, plenty of people would love to see it and maybe see what their views are. It sounds genuinely interesting if it exists, but for some reason you mention it, and when someone asks “where are these posts? i did my best finding them, but can’t”, you’re like “no, stop harrassing me, i said it exists, but i’m not going to show you”.
Because it’s a ridiculous thing to question someone on and the dude is a known troll that I have zero respect for.
Is that enough of a reason?
I simply said that I called out OpenAI back when people defended it. What about this requires proof? It’s a dumb hill to fight on let alone die on.
Ah, now he’s a well known troll.
Now i don’t know much about the users here, so could be he’s a troll. But i don’t see him as trolling you in this discussion, he asked a good faith question, and you go completely off the rails…
The proof that would be required would be you calling out openai and people defending them. I mean, that’s just blindingly obvious you know. The few times i referenced something i did in the past in a discussion, i linked my previous posts showing that, otherwise i could claim anything. It just seems like the most basic etiquette in a discussion. You said people were defending openAI here on lemmy when you were calling them out. And now people are curious about this and you’re like “i’ll never show you”.
I really don’t get how that’s so difficult for you. Great that you saw the openai bullshit coming from a mile away, but that doesn’t mean you have to act this ridiculous when someone is curious to the context and asks you for an example when they did the effort to find such an example and couldn’t…
And to not be too hypocritical XD. Here’s an example of me linking to a previous post when i thought it matter to show i was saying what i was saying before more information about a subject came to light: https://old.reddit.com/r/TrackMania/comments/njq0q0/lots_of_people_have_been_saying_that_he_just_made/gz9it8s/
There was no good faith whatsoever in the question, because the answer is irrelevant to the topic. Dude is fishing for a debate and chose this hill to plant a flag.
He’s now responding to my comment on this discussion, as he has in others where I wasn’t even talking to him. Do you need more reason why I won’t bother with this clown?
He’s an antagonist.
“Known troll” source??
check my modlog… then yours
You understand that being a troll within the rules won’t land you a lot of mod log infractions, right?
You picked a fight here for no reason bro. How about you just walk away?