that’s… not what I said??? geography teaches you the military strengths of a country, not the name of the country. all of your ‘arguments’ are based on you saying that geography is topography.
topography=names of countries and regions
geography=global politics, global economy, how the earth formed and works, how global markets work. etc.
because your many years of experience with the subject geography have taught you that geography is topography?
Your statement that a countries militaristic capability is based on or influenced by what they named their region is stupid.
that’s… not what I said??? geography teaches you the military strengths of a country, not the name of the country. all of your ‘arguments’ are based on you saying that geography is topography.
topography=names of countries and regions
geography=global politics, global economy, how the earth formed and works, how global markets work. etc.
“How many tanks do we have?”
“I’ll get our top geographer to send us an estimate right away, sir.”
are you even reading my comments? or are you misunderstanding them by purpose?