• boydster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    And the conditions in 2016 were markedly different than they were in 2020, unless you don’t believe in the forward progression of time.

    In other news, a tautology is a tautology.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, conditions in 2016 were markedly different. Biden was the VP of a highly successful president. Hillary had been demonized by the right for 2 decades and by the left for 1 decade. By the forward progression of time, Biden was weaker in 2024 than he was in 2020. Conversely, he would have been a stronger candidate in 2016.

      Listen, every other “X could have beat Trump” is a hypothetical. Trump has only ever been beaten once, and I don’t want to carry on a factual debate with a Qanon MAGA hat that doesn’t believe in logic, just “feels”, so good night.

      • boydster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well clearly someone’s emotions have gotten the best of them. Have fun wallowing in your hypotheticals and lashing out at people meaninglessly. After 8 years of Obama, America was not voting for Obama 2 immediately after. That is a crazy take.

        Edit: Obama 2, now more boring and uninspiring!

        I was there. Biden was not the solution then.