• ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Deflation, even in small amounts, is more dangerous, thats why ideally you prefer having a small amount of inflation.

    This is only accurate if you measure economic success by “Corporate profits”.

    Deflationationary phases are very helpful for the working class, as their dollar now buys MORE things. Like food. And housing. And health care.

    • JWBananas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Deflationationary phases are very helpful for the working class, as their dollar now buys MORE things. Like food. And housing. And health care.

      What kind of braindead take is that? The working class? The same working class that majorly lives paycheck to paycheck and can’t even afford an unexpected $500 expense?

      What dollars do you think they are going to have in a deflationary economy after they get laid off?

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        You know in what form those paychecks generally come in? Cash, so their paycheck is now literally worth more without wage increases (which aren’t horribly stable for those generally loving paycheck to paycheck).

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            You’ve got that backwards. People get laid off, can’t buy things, then prices go down because demand is lower.

            • JWBananas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              It’s not just consumer spending that influences inflation,/deflation but also institutional spending. The consumer price index is a lagging indicator. Decreases in institutional spending precede unemployment and the eventual reduced demand for consumer goods and services. And increases in the fed rate (and/or other forces which cause the cost of borrowing money for institutions/investors to rise) generally precede that.

              • hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Institutional spending will decrease as credit markets seize up. If deflation is predictable at, say, 1-2%, then it shouldn’t be a factor since credit would account for that.