• kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    What the hell, I misread the OP’s title and thought it was about stuff that was common 20 years ago which is no longer normal… I was very confused with everybody else’s answers lmao.

    Sadly I can’t think of an answer for the thread, so downvote/upvote at your will 😂

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    porn was freely available and could be purchased at stores in many parts of the US.

    sex toys were widely available and could be purchased from the comfort of your own sex swing.

    now we have Qualuviagra which not only increases the size of your penis* but also makes you forget all about your low-T*

    *studies shown that penis size temporarily increases but long-term use will actually shrink it. prolonged use can induce Baby-Dick Syndrome (BDS). Abuse of the product is considered a class 1 felony and you will be registered as a sex offender unless you’re a registered Republican.

    *low T is a myth falsified by global warming scientists in order to confuse and belittle Republicans with BDS. If you are taking Qualuviagra to treat low-T, reach out to your nearest MediRogan for details about having low-T.

  • burgersc12@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    In 20 years we will be shocked that we lived with all of the unnecessary fossil fuel usage while the world was slowly boiling. Oops, we fucked up the biosphere, guess we’ll just move to mars and eat fucking solar rays ffs.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hopefully, single use plastics would be a ridiculous thing in the future, maybe they will look back at it like we look back at asbestos.

    Here is a funny asbestos ad from the past

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Probably not many. Asbestos is bad when it gets into the air. If it’s within an oven mitt, even if cut, how would it get into the air?

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    20 years is a bit short but… Eating animals will be regarded as highly immoral, “but everyone knew those animals suffered, right?”, on the same level as we now judge slavery

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This is farfetched. People love meat, and we have for our entire history. Even India only has around 30% vegetarian population. The demand for not just protein but specifically meat will never go away.

      The only way I see us avoiding animal slaughter is by mastering bioengineering to the point where we can grow a perfectly marbled brisket in a lab without actually cloning the whole cow.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s sadly impossible until we guarantee food for everyone. It’s a luxury to choose where and what your next meal is.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          This is so weird. Do people realize animals need to eat? Why don’t we eat that food directly? Eating animals makes for less food, not more. Like how 75% of soy is cattle feed, and then vegans get blamed for deforestation for soy beans. It’s ridiculous. Willful ignorance

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Eh, only sorta. Plenty of animals can be fed on things we can’t eat. They tried raising rabbits in NK for example because they can survive off rocky ground that wouldn’t grow crops.

            Third world problem though. First world countries could be vegetarian easily.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      As is, one can only hope. Until a source of animal-like protein can be perfected and become cheap enough for sustained consumption by a lower class individual, some people (more than you realize) will not be able to get off animal proteins due to various medical conditions. I suppose accessible cures for these conditions would be a proper solution as well.

      I’m not even going to touch on the luxury of choosing your next meal here, since that’s been addressed already.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nope, I can’t see this happening either, unless bides take over.

      Toilet paper is actually rather effective, it is cheap, easily processed, effective enough at removing most of the crap, it does not require added water infrastructure (I would not clean my ass with grey water) and simple to teach new users

      • MrKurtz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you happened to touch shit with literally any part of your body other than your asshole, would you be happy with just wiping it with a piece of dry paper, or would you immediately go wash it?

        I have no more questions…

        Btw, don’t even get me started if you have a hairy butt.

      • gazter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Added water infrastructure? My guy, the connection for the cistern is right there. The added infrastructure is literally a tee piece and the hose.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That is fair, though in places with unreliable water I doubt that using water to flush or a bidet would be the first priority.

          • gazter@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            This is just my experience, but that experience includes travelling through some remote areas in less developed countries. Water to wash is usually the first upgrade on the tech tree- It’s unlocked right after you dig a hole in the ground. Grinding xp to get plumbing will make life nicer, but to start with you just need to gather enough resources for a bucket.

    • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Poison the cancer slightly faster than the whole organism! My dad cancer treatment gave him liver disease that eventually turned into a cancer that was way more deadly than his original cancer.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      20 years though? That’s incredibly generous and unlikely imo.

      People are refusing to tackle the infrastructure issue of people charging their cars who do not own single family detached homes. It’s a significant population of people for which owning an electric vehicle is a huge inconvenience. Public charging stations exist, but take significantly longer than the 2 minutes it takes to pump gas.

      The second big thing is that people simply don’t replace their cars that often. Might be pulling this out of my ass, but I had read recently that the average person replaces their vehicle every 7-12 years…and it is often not with a brand new vehicle. Considering how electric cars still make a very small percentage of those on the road, I can’t see 100% removal of gas vehicles in 20 years in only a few generations of vehicle ownership change.

      The Nissan Leaf came out around 15 years ago as the first big name, somewhat popularish electric vehicle. Yet in 2025 electric vehicles are nowhere close to even 50% of vehicles on the road.

      In the more distant future? Sure. 20 years ain’t happening tho.

      But we’ll see!

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think 17% is “a very small percentage”

        And I believe 90% of new cars sold in Norway this year were electric

        Remember to discount any stats from the US, they’re always at least a decade behind on everything

        • dingus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I just looked up your source. That is of new vehicles sold. While a good start, you’re skipping my latter part about people not replacing their vehicles for a decade. Only 3% of vehicles globally on the road are EVs per the source.

    • 667@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even wilder than that will be some form of social compromise in fully-autonomous vehicles.

      People won’t want to part with the flexibility of driving their own cars, and once things are standardized and safety records are proven, people will eventually find acceptance in automated vehicles.

      I hypothesize that major thoroughfares/highways will be fully-automated and only surface streets will be self-driving. This is a sort of hybrid-solution which generally addresses a great deal of traffic issues.

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        As many people as there are who won’t want to hand over control to the car computer for various reasons, there are A LOT of people who would rather be on their phones than drive (many of whom currently try to do both simultaneously 😬)

        • 667@lemmy.radio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          There are parallels to when autopilot first began to proliferate in aviation. I’d have to do some research to confirm, but I am certain there was at least a segment of people who would have said they trusted pilots to fly more than autopilot. Now it’s 99% autopilot. The pilots of scheduled air services typically hand control to autopilot fairly shortly after departure, and for quite a long time before arrival. In some cases there are even autopilot-coupled approach to landings… and nobody bats an eye.

          We collectively spend millions of hours in traffic, and lose thousands of lives to preventable accidents (like drowsy/sleepy/influenced driving).

          Aviation made the switch to save lives, and eventually drivers will, too.

          When we look back, we’ll wonder how we were such savages about insisting we drive manually.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I bet at least 50 years after autonomous driving works correctly manual driving will be outlawed and only be done by enthusiasts on dedicated race tracks.

        Or maybe not outlawed but most people won’t have a license. Seeing a normal car might be a similar novelty as seeing a horse carriage.

        • 667@lemmy.radio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          99% agree. We will find it as absurd as considering horse-drawn carriage as a contemporary mode of transport, and while legal overall, their use is prohibited on interstate highways, as will be manually-driven vehicles. And we might not even have to wait 50 years!

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nope, autonomous driving will probably evolve into a drive by wire system, where you drive the computer that drives the car, that means that you are kept in a safety bubble where your inputs are validated to be safe by the computer before they are performed.

          Similar to that of fighter jets today.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not in 20 year mate.

      Oil has a massive problem, it is just too fucking good at what it does, energy density of a battery is far, far below petrol, and require complex infrastructure at the point of sale, while petrol can even be dispensed without electricity.

    • toddestan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unless something drastic happens, there will be a decent number of cars on the road in 20 years that are already on the road today.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    People probably wouldn’t believe we sold water in plastic water bottles or shopped with disposable plastic bags.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I legitimately do not understand why so many people refuse to drink tap water. I get that an occasional bottle of water is convenient when traveling or something, but some of my neighbors seem to only drink bottled water even at home. The city will literally test your water for free if you don’t trust it for some reason.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Tap in many places has a distinctive ‘taste’ to it. A cheap filter is WAY more useful (and way cheaper) than bottled water though.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Where I live, plastic bags and styrofoam are already rare now. Now we just have to wait for people to realize water is free.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          You should go on street view and check out Asia, whenever I visited Thailand and see a backroad, there is a huge number of used plastic bottles lying next to the road.

          They still get drinking water from bottles.

          Weather that is the case in large cities like Bangkok I don’t know as I haven been there enough to learn.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Single-use plastic, yeah. Things like Tupperware will stick around unless we go back to using asphalt for food preservation.

      I think we’re going to see single use wax-paper or similar displace the plastic and Styrofoam for your delivery order.