The woman who actually lives in the house had just moved to Oklahoma City from Maryland with her family about two weeks earlier.

“I keep asking them, ‘who are you? What are you doing here? What’s happening,’” she said. “And they said, ‘we have a warrant for the house, a search warrant.’”

She said they ordered her and her daughters outside into the rain before they could even put on clothes.

“They wanted me to change in front of all of them, in between all of them,” she said. “My husband has not even seen my daughter in her undergarments—her own dad, because it’s respectful. You have her out there, a minor, in her underwear.”

Marisa said the names on the search warrant were not hers or anyone in her family.

“We just moved here from Maryland,” she said. “We’re citizens. That’s what I kept saying. We’re citizens.”

She said the agents didn’t care.

“They were very dismissive, very rough, very careless,” she said. “I kept pleading. I kept telling them we weren’t criminals. They were treating us like criminals. We were here by ourselves. We didn’t do anything.”

Marisa said the agents tore apart every square inch of the house and what few belongings they had, seizing their phones, laptops and their life savings in cash as “evidence.”

“I told them before they left, I said you took my phone. We have no money. I just moved here,” she said. “I have to feed my children. I’m going to need gas money. I need to be able to get around. Like, how do you just leave me like this? Like an abandoned dog.”

Before they left, Marisa said one of the agents made a comment.

“One of them said, ‘I know it was a little rough this morning,’” she said. “It was so denigrating. That you do all of this to a family, to women, your fellow citizens. And it was a little rough? You literally traumatized me and my daughters for life. We’re going to have to go get help or get over this somehow.”

Now, Marisa said they have, quite literally, nothing.

“I said, ‘when are we going to get our stuff back?’ They said it could be days or it could be months,” she said.

Marisa said she is left with nothing but questions.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      It should be illegal…

      But with alternating between Republicans and neoliberals for 50 years, no one has ever actually put in serious effort to reign in police. Asset seizure is 100% legal and since they’re “charging” the money/property there’s no presumed innocence.

      Biden didn’t fix policing, Obama didn’t, and under Clinton it got worse in large part due to a bill Biden wrote.

      Obviously Republicans have been worse, but the point is shit doesn’t ever get better.

      We have a good DNC now, that won’t block good candidates, but that’s a very recent development

      Quick edit:

      This meant to be a reply to someone else, but something weird is happening

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        We have a good DNC now, that won’t block good candidates, but that’s a very recent development

        Wouldn’t be so sure about that. Ken Martin is out there trying to stop David Hogg from primarying incumbents.

        • cristo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Good, Hogg has no traction and never will win an election. He should be the last choice for the left.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Huh? He’s not running for election; he’s using his PAC to support young progressives primarying Dem incumbents in safe blue seats.

              • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                The bigger issue is that you felt it necessary to comment via assumptions rather than even doing a cursory google search. Without knowing anything about charisma or policy you said he should be the last choice for the left? Do you think the incumbents are doing a good job?

                • cristo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 days ago

                  No I don’t think incumbents are doing a good job, but I know David Hogg, his policy positions, and public outlook. He is not a good candidate in my opinion. I was surprised and thought he was running with the way he worded his comment.

  • aramova@infosec.pubOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    Remember folks, every vote counts. We did this to ourselves.

    I’ve said it before elsewhere but it needs to be heard…

    It’s just wild to me continually seeing posts not understanding how this all works, and how it would play out. It’s like the people who thought China paid the tariffs…

    The house is almost tied. That’s who passes bills, handles impeachments, some of the most powerful committees are, and who impeaches Presidents…

    218 Republicans, 213 Democrats.

    Let’s see, take New York for example.

    26 representatives total, 19 Democrat and 7 Republican.

    5 of those were within 2 points last time their seat was up.

    People who think that New York is blue, their vote doesn’t matter, skips the votes for the House and Senate and end up losing a Blue house seat but later complain that nothing changes are literally the fucking problem.

    Every. Fucking. State. Is. Like. This.

    Apathetic morons who don’t realize that the president is only held accountable by the other branch of government then wave their hands around when they did jack shit to help put people in place to, are the fucking problem.

    District 3 of California was lost by 24,000 votes. District 22 was lost by 3,000.

    Those two seats in the house, along with the close ones in New York, Jersey, Michigan, Illinois, Washington, hell every state… Are what makes the House of Representatives or breaks it.

    So, if you think that your vote for president doesn’t matter, so you skip voting and let these other seats slip, yes, you’re a fucking moron who can’t grasp basic concepts of government that are taught in 4th grade.

    And don’t get me started on the State House/Senates, how they define voting laws and voting zones and engage in gerrymandering.

    Every fucking vote counts.

    And until the country realizes it, and starts acting on it, we’ll keep getting the shit we deserve.

    House needs a simple majority, and two thirds of the Senate.

    Democrats would need ~18 seats.

    First, that won’t happen in 2026.

    Even the best cases make it hard to win enough by 2028. Which is why impeachment is just not something we can hold out for.

    Gerrymandering is part of why this is a problem, which is done at the local level, and again why every vote counts.

    How could it play out? Assuming some absurdly weird upside down world just opposite of what we’re living in, this is the only path just looking at the numbers…

    Again, Democrats would need to gain 18 net seats. Seats Potentially in Play (Republican Incumbents): This requires looking at seats up in upcoming cycles.

    • Class 1 Seats (Up in 2026):
      • Highly Competitive Targets: These would be the first priority. States where Democrats have won statewide recently or that lean only slightly Republican. Examples based on recent political history might include:
        • North Carolina (Budd-R)
        • Alaska (Sullivan-R) - Unique dynamics with ranked-choice voting.
      • Stretch Targets: States that are more Republican but could potentially flip under exceptionally favorable conditions (like the hypothetical turnout).
        • Iowa (Ernst-R)
        • Montana (Daines-R) - Depends heavily on candidate matchups.
        • Kentucky (McConnell-R’s seat - potential retirement changes dynamics)
        • Kansas (Marshall-R)
        • South Carolina (Graham-R)
      • Very Difficult Targets: Solidly Republican states requiring overwhelming Democratic turnout and significant shifts among other voters.
        • Texas (Cornyn-R)
        • Mississippi (Wicker-R)
        • Alabama (Tuberville-R)
        • West Virginia (Capito-R)
        • Oklahoma (Mullin-R - Special election winner)
        • Wyoming (Lummis-R)
        • Idaho (Risch-R)
        • Arkansas (Cotton-R)
        • Nebraska (Ricketts-R)
        • South Dakota (Rounds-R)
        • Louisiana (Cassidy-R) - Jungle primary system.
    • Class 2 Seats (Up in 2028): (Looking further ahead)
      • Highly Competitive Targets:
        • Maine (Collins-R) - Often competitive, depends on matchup.
        • Georgia (Perdue/Ossoff dynamic showed competitiveness, depends who holds it after '26 potentially) - Assuming GOP holds a seat here.
      • Stretch Targets:
        • Michigan (Peters-D currently, but listing potential GOP flips back if one happened hypothetically before 2028) - Generally leans D, but could be contested.
        • New Hampshire (Shaheen-D currently) - Generally leans D, but listing potential GOP flips back.
      • Very Difficult Targets: (Many solidly Republican states)
        • Tennessee (Hagerty-R)
        • Alaska (Murkowski-R historically, depends on dynamics)
        • North Carolina (Tillis-R)
        • Iowa (Grassley-R seat potentially)
        • Texas (Cruz-R)
        • Kentucky (Paul-R)
        • And many others similar to the 2026 list (SC, AL, MS, WY, ID, NE, SD, KS, WV, OK).

    It’s going to take an absolutely historic level of pain to both drive enough people to vote MAGA out to make this change though.

    The amount that’s being excused, sanewashed, and just drowned out with other absurdities…

    We’re on all on this shit ride until some new wildcard comes into play.

    No impeachment, no Supreme Court, no guardrail is going to change that.

    Something new and unaccounted for is the only feasible catalyst.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      every vote counts

      Ummm, not to be an ass but no. The usa has some of the highest number of disenfranchisement in the world. Then you have people like me who’s vote does not count at all in american elections (there are dozens of us!).

      • aramova@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Confidently incorrect.

        Like I said, every single local election, from city BOE and councils, to county boards to state officials count.

        The local elections are who draw the districts are who disenfranchise.

        The county courts, the district courts who are elected are who rule in favor of gerrymandering.

        So if you skip a vote, if you are too busy, too tired, too hungover, that’s it. It’s on you.

        If you can’t grasp that, it’s on you.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          I am not american, and if I was one of approximately 5.1 million (that is about 1 out of 44 or so people) who have lost the ability to vote, no I don’t have a say in any level of us politics.

          You are as a nation well past the “lesser evil” party saving you. You are full on into the sort of terrible collapse shown in the subject of the article you are promoting. As a side note, with how the silly two teams system of yours works, the dems if back in power will forever be a little worse then before trump.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Not be that guy, but the person you’re replying to isn’t exactly wrong in saying “every vote counts is wrong” in some cases.

          Being pedantically literal, yes, every vote is counted.

          The reality of First Past The Post voting and the Electoral College is that the only votes that “count” insofar that they actually affect the outcome of an election are votes for the winning party. Now add on to that the common understanding that both major parties only care about what their corporate donors have to say, and that individual voter participation isn’t likely to influence anything other than the party campaign strategy for the next election.

          That means that if enough people vote as a collective to flip which party wins, then and only then does their vote count for anything meaningful. People should vote anyways, but it’s not hard to see why someone might be just a little bit disenfranchised when their participation in the democratic process seems to result in nothing but wasted time because they live next to a bunch of a conservative hicks.

          You are absolutely right about smaller state and local elections, though. Those are where each vote actually has a chance to be meaningful.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            Or you live in DC, or Puerto Rico or any other US territory, or are a felon, or an immigrant. I am really shocked that anyone can look at the usa and see a democracy in this day and age.

          • aramova@infosec.pubOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            And it’s the local smaller elections that form the basis of the “parties” that put those candidates up.

            The DNC and RNC, all those people sent from the states to nominate who the Democrat or Republican runner is, they’re all locals.

            If people stepped up and replaced those ignorant twats, we’d get something different.

            But instead, we whine that it doesn’t matter and don’t do anything and wonder why it doesn’t change.

    • pulido@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I wish people didn’t vote against Bernie in the primaries.

      I’d vote to support progressive candidates, but neo-liberals can legitimately go fuck themselves.

      We should unite and convince people to stop voting for establishment candidates. It’s their turn to fall in line since progressives aren’t doing it.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    1000024598

    In all seriousness these are the stories that have actually been reported, which means there are probably a lot more that have not been reported. Hope people start to rise up.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Some people haven’t experienced anything bad yet, so they don’t care. Some people realize that once the fighting starts we’re all fucked for the next few decades at minimum and for a few centuries worst-case. And some people are positively thrilled by what’s happening and are cheering everything on.

        Hence why there’s no rioting, yet. I hope it’s coming, that we don’t just roll over like the Iranians and the Russians did for their autocrats, but I also fear that it is coming.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          the tariffs hasnt hit most peoples stores yet, so its out of sight of mind. also because they think something will stop it down the line.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    “What if I would have been armed,” she said.

    What, indeed.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      The term used for it in law enforcement is “civil asset forfeiture”. For her to get it back, her property is going to have to get a lawyer to defend that it is probably not used in a crime or purchased with funds obtained through criminal activity. Doing that is not cheap.

      • aramova@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If anyone thinks Schadrach is being a troll, they’re not. CAF is really fucked up when you look into its use and what it takes to get it back.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, wasn’t trolling. They literally start a court case against the property to determine if that property was used in or purchased through the proceeds of a crime, and the standard is a preponderance of the evidence. Hiring a lawyer to defend your property against the allegation it was bought with drug money or w/e often costs more than replacing it would. Which is the point.

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    Illegal search and seizure. Where’s the nra? The various groups that swore to uphold the constitution?

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      The NRA gave up their ‘jack-booted thugs’ rhetoric and started kissing Republican asses when Bush Jr. was president. Bush very publicly renounced his lifetime membership over LaPierre’s–very, very reasonable and measured–stance that the feds were shitty people. The NRA caved rather than continue to speak the obvious truth, and they’ve had a fetish for licking cop boots ever since.

  • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    ICE needs to be abolished. If they can’t do their job effectively and legally then they shouldn’t have jobs.

        • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Yea it keeps people hating one another simply for being born somewhere else and ensures class warfare amongst the population.

          • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Immigration laws exist to manage the flow of people into and out of a country, regulating who can enter, for what purpose, and for how long. These laws are based on principles like family reunification, providing humanitarian aid, and recognizing skilled workers who benefit the economy. Additionally, they serve to ensure national security and public safety.

              • Suite404@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                Gotta love how lazy people are that they can’t even argue their own point without asking a machine to make it for them.

                • dickalan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  The solution to not repeating yourself is to stop talking, but you just love the attention whether negative or positive

                • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Exactly how much arguing with people on Lemmy do you do that you find it too tiresome to do it yourself, but rather than just not engaging, you have a machine do it for you? Tbh, sounds like some shit a troll factory would do.

              • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                They exist because governments need to understand who the hell is in their borders for numerous reasons. If you don’t think that borders should exist… well then countries don’t exist… and so on…

                • Snowclone@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  This is paranoia not reality. The US has had very open boarders for a long long time, the boarder between Mexico and the US only had check points for commerce for most of my life until W started the fever dream that people moving across the boarder is going to get all the white women killed. This isn’t reality. There aren’t droves of Mexicans raping and killing white women, in fact, immigrants commit the least amount of crime out of any group of people in the US. This isn’t a problem if you aren’t a fucking racist paranoid idiot.

            • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              I’m going to disregard that first sentence because you’re explaining what they do, not giving good reasons for why they exist. In the second sentence, you indicated the principles that their existence is supposedly rooted in, but still fail to provide a good reason. Now, the third sentence: How do they ensure national security and public safety? Is there meaningful, demonstrable, or statistically significant evidence that this is the case, or are you taking it at face value to be the truth?

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The cruelty is the point. ICE is the refuge for assholes too racist even by normal Texas police standards.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    A lot of communities now have local organizations with armed volunteers ready to show up and stop ICE.

    Try to look around for your local leftist orgs, if one isn’t already doing this then it’s probably coming soon or just one comment away from realizing it’s a good idea.

    Find your local orgs, stay in contact, stay organized, and stay armed.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Technically, it was the correct home, just the occupants changed.

    Man, if only there was some way to determine who the correct residents are BEFORE doing a raid… 🤔

      • dickalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t want weak cowards anywhere in my nation, so yeah, you can leave buddy, don’t let the door hit your ass on the way If you are even in this country, I have a feeling you are not.

      • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        LMAO why do people always say this.

        If it were that easy, the entire population of every authoritarian country would have already moved out.

        • derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          At least you won’t get shot or tried (looking at you NK). It is not easy, but not impossible, and there is a tipping point, which is different for everyone as people have different values and scales.

          For someone, paying 10$ an egg is survivable as long as their family is close.

    • trumboner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      You mentioned southern states, but I just checked a few other states, because I was thinking maybe they’re blue, liberal, and it may be better:

      HI: D- IL: D- MA: F WA: D-

      Oops!!!

      For comparison: OK: D- TX: D+

      TX scored the highest out of these states. We’re fucked!

      • suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah unfortunately it’s no guarantee that blue states are better. Many are, but not all. Colorado, California, and New York all score a ‘C’, still not great but much better.

      • SparroHawc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        If you think that’ll stop them, I have a bridge to sell you. In case you hadn’t noticed, the law doesn’t mean anything any more to the people in power.