Summary

Elon Musk, co-head of the Department of Government Efficiency under Donald Trump’s advisory team, revised his claim of finding $2 trillion in federal budget cuts to a “best-case outcome” of $1 trillion.

Musk’s earlier target, dismissed as unrealistic by experts, had included the entire discretionary budget of $1.7 trillion.

While Musk and co-lead Vivek Ramaswamy plan to recommend cuts, specifics remain unclear.

Experts warn savings may require targeting mandatory programs like Medicaid, potentially causing hardships.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Wherever he cut, you can safely assume it will only hit the people at the bottom, not those at the top.

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 hours ago

    i’m actually kind of shocked he admitted this. isn’t his usual strategy to promise super unrealistic things, not deliver, and then make the same promise the next year?

  • 5in1k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If he cuts anything it’ll be support for middle class and poor people and itll be jack shit, it will fuck everything up and it will be touted by clowns as a success.

  • Whateley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Those two clowns couldn’t find their own asses in a dark room with both hands and a flashlight.

  • makyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Anyone who actually believed they would find $2 trillion was an idiot, the rest of us knew they’d just cut the things they hate, bump the subsidies that favor them and their friends, and call it a day.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I expect them to privatize and then somehow claim they cut the budget because they are paying a private company instead of running whole departments themselves (govt)

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The funny thing is…it’s not like their voters would care if they lied. They could literally say “We cut the budget by $17 trillion by making sure the trans kids don’t get surgeries!” And their voters would fucking cheer.

      They wouldn’t look deep enough to actually care what they cut.

      So the question is why even make this announcement? I’m guessing it’s a distraction from something else.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Your comment will age poorly when Trump’s tarrifs lead to a collapsing economy and he prints money like mad to solve it, resulting in hyper-inflation letting President Musk keep his election promise.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not even there. DoD is ~$840B and DHS another sixty. Not even one trillion in the entire US security apparatus, but they were going to so easily find twice that. It was always pure nonsense.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Musk’s earlier target, dismissed as unrealistic by experts, had included the entire discretionary budget of $1.7 trillion.

    FFS! There’s probably TODDLERS who know more about how the government works than Musk! 🤦

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve always said there were 4 types of people (besides average)

      1. Genius that knows they are a genius
      2. The Genius that doesn’t know they are a genius
      3. The idiot that knows they are an idiot
      4. The idiot that thinks they are a genius

      The most dangerous one, and the one you don’t ever want to work for is #4. That’s where Musk is.

  • shininghero@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Oh please, you’re not even going to get $100 billion without stepping on some toes in the Military-Industrial complex, and that’s going to make you some lifelong political enemies.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Oh that’s not what he meant at all.

      He meant slashing social security and Medicare. Obviously rich people aren’t going to feel the pinch.

  • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It’s because they were told they can’t cut VA, SSI or Medicare, I promise.

    The rich assholes always think they can just cut healthcare and retirement payouts but politicians know they will never get re-elected if it happens on their watch. The old people who rely on this shit are the only ones voting anyway.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The second trillion will be found when DOGE Block 3 rolls out, and Elon’s gonna need … $5 billion dollars for DOGE Block 2 and 3.

    (DOGE Block 2 will find the first trillion, after DOGE Block 1 is later revised down to 750 billion)

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    We did this exercise as a civic learning experience in 9th year government/social studies classes. The teacher had us go through a mock (simplified) Federal budget and decide which line items to cut to achieve a “balanced budget” with debt reduction.

    The problem is largely intractable for reasons that become obvious even to middleschool kids. Do you completely cut popular things like the space program? Gut entitlement spending? Massively increase taxes across all brackets? Reduce the military or infrastructure spending to laughable levels? All of those things are very unpopular but that is what it would really take to tackle the problem.

    • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You tax the 1% until they’re the 10% then shove that money into infrastructure and welfare. Then you sit back and watch the American Exceptionalism machine go brrrr again just like the 50’s

      • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Problem is, if the goal is to greatly reduce or eliminate the debt, you could confiscate 100% of the 1%s wealth and it would barely make a dent.

        • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          This is absolutely false. The top 1% in the US control 50 TRILLION dollars. More than enough to go around with plenty to spare for a rainy day.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Never fear rich people and corporations - Trump is still going to do another $2T tax cut regardless.