"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 days agoTRUCKIN'lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1325arrow-down17
arrow-up1318arrow-down1external-linkTRUCKIN'lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square100fedilink
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 days agoI have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 days agoI’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
minus-squareHupf@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 days agoWouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?
I have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
I’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
Wouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?