• betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ll assume they’re talking about breaking up clumps instead of the thing a serial killer would do and then just phrased it poorly.

      • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What they mean does not matter.

        Nearly every internet comment section for the last thirty years summed up in one line.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Also the vast majority of human communication, which is so full of implications instead of stating things directly to determine who is part of their in group or to avoid conflict that people have a hard time just being clear and concise when they really should be.

          • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I agree - there’s some large accesibility-like issues with communication, which causes issues for people where it isn’t their first language, the neurodiverse, or in safety critical applications. The /s is a fine early example of that.

            That said, if everyone stuck to basic facts and focussed on clarity rather than content, the world would be a mega boring place.

      • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Which would be a poor but not completely unreasonable way to describe what happens when you squish a clump to split it into individual grains so the oil can cook it evenly instead of making an oily white rice ball that has a fried outer surface.