It’s in the eye of the beholder, of course. But it would be great to see some solid recommendations.

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t think it’s the distros job to look visually appealing. That’s the job of the desktop environment. Seriously I wish distributions would just ship vanilla desktop environments. All of the themed variants always have some issues. Maybe I’m just old and stubborn but that’s my opinion.

    • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fuckin same. It took so long for me to realize a lot of issues I had wasn’t because gnome was shit, it was because every distro fucks with gnome until it’s unusable. I finally tried fedora and now gnome is my favorite DE and I love the workflow.

    • Tmpod@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, distros should, at most, change the default accent color and some pannel icon, but no more than that.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I can’t think of any desktop environments that are ugly or hard to use out of the box

    • Einar@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Granted.

      For a beginner, however, this is a difference that would take some explaining. As you said, some distros heavily theme the desktop environments (DE) before shipping, so in that sense the question is fair.

      By extension, of course, I am with you, as with the right amount of work, any distro can run any DE and make it look any way.

  • olafurp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think GNOME looks very visually appealing with it’s consistency. The Libadwaita library has a nice aesthetic and looks very clean with nice spacing for elements to “breathe”.

    I still prefer KDE since I can tailor the look to my needs and I prefer to have clutter over extra clicks. (I have top bar with “Opened programs”, Launcher, System tray, Time and a global menu and KWin script for managing Activities)

    I feel like modern era of design has gone a bit overboard with the “clean” direction. It can be contrasted with Windows XP where you click “All programs” and you literally get all programs in the start menu with options of how to run or open them. I prefer to do “Menu” - > “Submenu” - > “Thing I want”.

    Come to think of it I should probably make a launcher for KDE.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Fedora Workstation. Gnome is pretty great on the eyes, and there’s a healthy Libadwaita apps ecosystem that is just *chefs kiss*

    ElementaryOS also looks great for the system and core apps, although there’s not really a third party app ecosystem that fits with the Pantheon theme, unfortunately.

    • Stiltonfondu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I second this but after getting Hyprland setup to my liking I don’t think I’ll ever go back to gnome or kde

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Hyprland is definitively not noob friendly. Are you running it on Arch or Fedora? I’ve been wanting to try it, but with all the config file work needed, it scares me to have it break at some or other update.

        • Stiltonfondu@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m using regular Fedora 40 workstation with Gnome

          If you enable the update testing repo you can just install “stable” hyprland using dnf.

          I’d say the tricky part of config at the start is getting your monitors setup but you can use ‘hyprctl monitors’ to list the monitors and get the ids. The documentation/wiki is really good

          Once you’ve got it installed you can logout of gnome and select hyprland from the cog on the login screen.

          If you want the git release of hyprland you can use this Copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/solopasha/hyprland/

          Other stuff I use Rofi for launching apps Hyprpaper for wallpapers Waybar-git for the bar Kitty for terminal

          • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Awesome. Fedora is my main driver (when i’m not distrohopping, lol). Thank you so much for sharing this. I’ll be taking it for a spin over the weekend.

            • Stiltonfondu@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Nice! have fun.

              I’d definitely avoid downloading other people’s hyprland dot files. Most are over complicated.

              Just keep it simple to fit your needs

  • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Linux Mint has a smooth, out-of-your-way look & feel to either MATE or Cinnamon that just makes me feel at home

    • Goingdown@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hardy Heron

      Ah, I really liked Ubuntu looks in old (4.04 - 8.04) versions. The brown/orange is so much better than the newer gray/purple/red whatever. Since 10.04 the theme and color scheme has been awful.

  • Drito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I like simple default, so it is easier to customize. But If I have to keep the default I would say Garuda.

  • agelord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Mint with Papirus icons and blue accent colour set to match the folder icons of Papirus them.

  • Mars2k21@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Really depends on the desktop but in terms of default desktops that are shipped with distros I’m picking Fedora’s GNOME (pretty much stock) and MX Linux’s XFCE.

    • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Just installed a USB boot for Mint (cinnamon) and MX (xfce).

      Both are so much nicer than I expected.

      Trying to figure out how to put together a sub-distro for friends & family that are considering moving away from windows.

      MX ranks higher out of the box (comes with VLC installed).