Edit: including corruption of superblocks

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    They’re objectively better

    From what I heard, Orange Pi had lots of software problems for instance with drivers, and the quality of distros are not nearly as good as the official for Raspberry Pi.

    • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      The Orange Pi 5 is a completely standard Rockchip RK3588S board. That SoC has complete driver support in Linux, and pretty good support on Windows as well.

      I can’t speak to any other Orange Pi products as that is the only one I have.

    • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      If all you want to run is their essentially proprietary spins of Linux then go overpay for a Raspberry Pi.

      If you actually want freedom of choice for software and universally good driver support then ditch ARM and go for good old x86 based SBCs like the Radxa X4 which is in the same price range and has better performance while also being a completely standard Intel N series (formerly Celeron) based PC.

      Shit like this is why I don’t have high hopes for ARM based PCs no matter how hard Microsoft, Qualcomm, Nvidia, and MediaTek push for them. x86 and its ecosystem have basically perfected the formula for machines with standardized software interfaces and peripherals with the sole exception being GPUs which will always be a PITA on any platform.

      Even if you want to only talk about Linux while the kernel itself may support a fuck ton of architectures all the rest of the software you might want to use is only guaranteed to work on x86. On everything else it may or may not work well and for proprietary stuff it may not even be ported to other architectures at all.