A fucking TV show host is going to be the man responsible for the defense of our country?

And then they were all gunned down by good guys with guns, right? Right?

Reading about how democracies fall is always a fascinating endeavor. Living through it not so much.

Oh, someone didn’t see the Latino voting numbers

https://lemmy.world/comment/13389939

I have enough respect for those people to know they are smart enough to understand the distinction.

Yes, no one is arguing that. The context was there’s no difference physiologically speaking. That was the premise.

No there really isn’t any Fair criticism of this. That’s kind of the point. This would be a personal decision about your own sexuality. The idea that you can choose who to sleep with even if it’s no one is entirely up to every individual. It’s literally nobody else’s business. If someone thinks they have any right to inject their opinion into this decision it shows are exactly the kind of person that these women are worried about. It’s some kind of innate sense that a person should be able to control the bodily autonomy of another. If you have it you’re the problem.

Every sentence of your third paragraph there is dripping with a sort of entitlement that is a a blaring siren for any woman who reads it.

Wow you don’t understand what incels are at all do you?

From a physiological standpoint? Seems virtually the same to me. The other guy said it was unhealthy. Is there anything unhealthy about abstinence?

It’s always amazing how many men out themselves in these threads. Immediately angry and defensive. There’s no greater way to know that you’re exactly the kind of man these women are worried about than having that reaction.

There’s nothing inherently unhealthy about being asexual.

Now he’s just worried that they’re talking about him. Which they probably are considering his immediate defensive reaction.

No. We should all be aware of that by now. They claim to have a strict read, when it’s convenient for them. We’ve seen undeniable proof from this very Supreme Court, from Samuel Alito in particular, that they will completely abandon that principle whenever they feel like.

They won’t be strict constructionists. The Heritage Foundation doesn’t endorse strict constructionists. They endorse whatever the hell supports their individual needs of the individual moments. They have no guiding principles or morals.

It’d be an absolutely stupid thing to even attempt. And Lord knows we need her right where she is. Hang on honey.

He had already been impeached twice you really think he was worried about getting it done a third time? Much less there being time enough for it Besides you can literally pardon people up till noon on inauguration day. He could have pardon them all on his way out the door. He certainly pardoned a bunch of his rich friends.

Election Theory also says you can never ever change the first pass the post system while working within a two-party system. Thus the only way change it is by breaking the two-party system. Which I agree you can’t do when there are two parties. However while I would never say to do it on purpose, the Democrats have already destroyed themselves on their own. So why not take advantage of it? Without the Democratic party there as a foil the Republican party will break apart as well. So this is a golden opportunity.

Well I guess that’s the problem there, the the morons showed up while the Alternatives did not. So you have to ask yourself, who are the real morons?

Well I’d prefer more than one thing to replace it, but certainly this is one of the rare opportunities to do so.