🖕 Fuck PayPal

And fuck Linus Tech Tips for intentionally keeping quiet about this after they found out.

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The product is spyware by design. It’s a honey pot for people trying to save a few bucks, while exposing their entire browsing behavior. They even called it honey…

  • jagermo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I said it in another post: if you see a bunch of influencers all suddenly peddling the same stuff, stay away. All of them can be bought.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      They whore for corpos, that’s who pays them

      Some do good work but got to assume they are an enemy until proven otherwise.

    • lemmeout@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I have a built-in spidey sense that hates any product that gets peddled simultaneously by a bunch of YouTubers.

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      See also: RayCons headphones, which appear to be unilaterally bullshit but were on absolutely every video for a couple of months, touted as being the very best.

      • deur@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Especially anything from NullDrive, they’re a very scummy group.

      • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        What annoys me the most is since his last drama, Linus HAS to be the face in every video now! Wtf it used to be a bunch of them took turns making videos, and it was fun seeing everyone work on different things. He has to be front and get all the attention, it just feels weird now.

        • ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Pretty sure it has nothing to do with him needing attention and everything to do with thumbnails of him getting more clicks. It’s the only thing the company cares about.

      • archonet@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Am I the only one who, upon seeing his videos for the first time, immediately thought he was an annoying little pinhead?

        Like, I’ve watched his channel(s) surge in popularity over the years, and this entire time I’ve just been wondering why, and the issues that have come out about his little empire since have only confirmed my initial prejudice.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Because of his name, I thought he was a pro-Linux channel. I was swiftly disappointed.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              I’m not exactly sure what you’re saying here, so I apologize if I’m misinterpreting, but - while I have many potential complaints about Linus - I don’t blame him for his name resembling the word “Linux.”

          • Canadian_Cabinet @lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            He once bricked his OS during a “run Linux for a week” challenge. He tried to do apt install steam or something and ignored a bunch of warnings. Of course he then bashed Linux because he didn’t pay attention

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              Yeah, I didn’t see that video, but I recall reading about it. Apparently the package manager warned him that something would be potentially destructive and he ignored the warning, then blamed Linux for it when it was destructive.

              • whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                Edit: that wall of text really got away from me sorry. Tried so hard to not be misunderstood 😅

                I really don’t wanna defend Linus here buuuut…

                I can see someone who’s switching over from Windows making the same mistake, especially if they’re good with Windows but new to Linux. You get so conditioned constantly telling Windows to take off the fucking training wheels and ignoring all its bullshit warnings that I can see you making the same assumptions on your first(ish) time using Linux. Plus you don’t expect something as benign as installing Steam to destroy your desktop manager.

                His biggest criticism if I remember correctly was also that widespread adoption won’t be feasible until <whatever distro> is idiot proof and I agree. Ease of use is there these days but the things that make Linux so powerful can also be the things your average Windows user (deletes desktop shortcuts by accident and panics thinking they uninstalled their apps level of technical) can use to break their install, especially if they blindly follow one of the many (sometimes out of date) tutorials out there that tell you to run some random commands in the terminal.

                With that said, it’s still his mistake. He should’ve read the damn instructions, and owned up to it more. He’s technical enough to know you can’t go in assuming you know how to use something you’re new to.

                Obligatory I fucking love Linux and hope it becomes the default someday not just because fuck Windows and fuck Microsoft, but because it’s genuinely amazing in its own right.

                • toynbee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  No worries about the WoT, I’ve often been there myself.

                  Thank you for the clarification. As I said, I didn’t see and don’t plan to watch the video, so I didn’t know the details. I don’t know what it would take for Linux to be widely adopted or whether it could be considered “ready” but I wish it would.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              I have nothing clever to say here, so normally I’d let my upvote express my feelings, but that feels inadequate in this case. I just wanted to use my words to let you know that this comment amused me a great deal and to thank you.

        • HornedMeatBeast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I got that creepy feeling from him the first time I saw a video of him. Every photo of him I saw set off alarms. I’ve also never understood why anyone even likes the guy.

          This was years before all the issues came to light.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I’m with you. I heard of him on Reddit forever ago and couldn’t get through a single video.

        • stardust@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Their entire video is an ad filled experience of shilling not only their sponsors but themselves. Incredibly obnoxious and cramming in every YouTube stereotype from begging for likes and subs to clickbait titles and then insisting they have to do it so they can have their cake and eat it makes them even more obnoxious than if they just did it without wanting to be forgiven for it.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            It’s getting worse, I can’t remember who but I was watching a video just the other day and their ad segment was the fucking ltt ratchet driver. You know, the one they supposedly made because they were tired of the market and the low quality rip-offs all the companies were just trying to make profit off of (it’s a shitty plastic screwdriver for 70$, link to pic and it’s being sold at fucking walmart now). They sold it as such a heart string story in the beginning, it’s just another mini-wannabe corporation.

            I don’t particularly feel bad at this point for their continued reputation downfall and the people responsible. Everyone has their own personal story of their favorite company which has turned to complete shit (Blizzard is one of mine). They didn’t come out strong but doubled down corporate style when everything started. That’s fine, but anyone staying and putting up with the stressful workplace knows what they’ve gotten themselves into.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              I used to think the importance of leadership at the top of a company to be overblown since they succeed based on the work of all of the employees, but it is pretty amazing how fast a change to shitty leadership can run a successful company into the ground.

            • CybranM@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              I have a few gripes with LTT but the screwdriver is legit good. A bit overpriced because of the branding sure but definitely not a throwaway product

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              That’s actually a very nice screwdriver. Nice ratchet screw drivers do cost that much. I have one, but given where LTT is these days as a company, I don’t recommend buying it.

              I would be very happy if creators were able to fund their operations off their own merch rather than outside advertising. That seems to be what Gamers Nexus does, or at least heading that way. What LTT does, though, is use it as an additional revenue source on top of their other advertising sources. Doing it right means resisting the urge to consume more and more, and LTT is not capable of that.

              • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                It’s the corporate doubling-down that you have to worry and look out for. As you say it’s a revenue source for them. In fact, they spent over 100k (as stated by them in their own shows) for “Marketing” to get this screwdriver out there, for something that’s a revenue source for them.

                It has to be such a lucrative deal for them that they are pulling resources from other revenue to prop this up. Prepare for the slow enshittification of his tools. They order them from a manufacturer, parts will become cheaper, bulks will slowly have less quality control, and they’ll “move on” to later versions that pocket them more cash. They really don’t have to worry about their reputation as a “Tool manufacturer”, they’ll just pass the blame off onto another party while sweeping things under the rug and continuing on whistling like nothing happened.

                I might need a !remind me on here in 10 years.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Oh please attack them on actual grounds rather than a made-up nonsense. The screwdriver is actually decent product if you care about that sort of thing. No one’s getting scammed there, It’s an actual product that’s of relatively good quality.

              If you don’t care about screwdrivers then you’re probably not interested in the product anyway and if you are a frequent screwdriver user you probably understand why it’s a good product.

              • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                Definitely could describe me as a frequent screwdriver user. Currently restoring 2 John Oster vintage drill drivers, tradesmen, electronic repair tinkerer (unfortunately for everyone else in my life as well, it’s always overwhelming), just basically always have a screwdriver in my hand every day.

                I think if I were to reevaluate my statement, I would put it as:

                “It’s a shitty-looking-plastic Screwdriver, for 70$”

                You can claim the inner mechanisms and their elevated teeth count “makes it a vastly superior product”, but as someone who owns several ratcheting screwdrivers, I wouldn’t recommend this out of the blue for someone. If someone has “particular gripes, all of which are solved with this product”, then it might be a good match for you.

                If you want to support them, the 70$ isn’t a bad price ticket for what you get. It’s like a donation with a really cool grab bag that you actually want. If you’re telling someone who doesn’t have a ratcheting screwdriver to first pay 70$ on this? You’re just shilling for the company.

                I can’t believe I have to say this near the year 2025 of our lord and saviour president musk, but don’t buy your fucking tools from a tech tip influencer. These are a MegaPro patent from an actual tool company. They are lower in price, rubber grips, and actually look better. If you don’t care about the look, spend an extra 10$ and get the Snapon with a LIFETIME WARRANTY. It’s the same one Linus used before he created this gimmick, he didn’t replace it because it had “sentimental value” apparently.

                I could go on and on, but obviously anyone that’s actually looked into it would know that this isn’t such a grand prize as those who want to push LTT merch make it out to be.

                edit: meant to say shitty looking plastic, not shitty plastic.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I never trusted Honey to begin with but this goes far deeper than I ever expected. I always wondered “yeah, but where do they get their money?” I always figured it was just a way to take people’s data and sell it to data brokers (which they probably also do, let’s be honest) but this is just blatant fraud. Stealing affiliate money from links and having companies pay them to purposefully give out worse coupon codes is just devious through and through. It’s basically free money and everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

      Enshittification correctly defined.

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Same. I never downloaded it or anything like it but I didn’t realize they were playing both sides. It’s fucked.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah I always wondered what the catch was? The CEO was always posting on Reddit trying to defend honey and how cool they were.

      Either way, I never trust any shopping deal plugins. The whole idea of them is sketchy.

      • reev@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        https://keepa.com/!

        I use this extension to get a general idea of whether a product usually goes for cheaper and whether or not to wait. Really conveniently on the Amazon page directly.

      • Electric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Only shopping plugin I use is the one that comes with Edge. Surprisingly good to track price history and find other sites selling the product. I considered some Chrome plugin that displays an Amazon product’s country of origin to avoid Chinesium but apparently it didn’t work well or something like that from reading the reviews. Had some attached rewards function for shopping with it, ick.

        • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          It’s funny how Edge got lambasted for it when they introduced that feature, but it’s legitimately super helpful and non-invasive.

          • Electric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            I had no idea it was, I don’t keep up with browser news. I just wish they didn’t migrate to Chromium. It became my main browser for a brief period before that.

            I just used it randomly when I was working and doing some shopping for a computer in my downtime and decided to try out the feature. That and the AI are super good when combo’ed to shop smart. Managed to save $800 off a quality laptop.

        • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          There’s a good one for Amazon called Keepa that shows you the price history of the item. Helps a ton keeping prices in check during sales like Prime Day to see how much you are actually saving, if anything.

          Also nice to see how much you could potentially save if you just wait for the next sale or if there was already a price decrease. Often times it looks like I’m good buying without waiting for any sale as the sales only knocked off a few dollars, at most.

          • Electric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Thank you for the recommendation, looks neat. Tracking prices of different conditions is a nice touch. I’ll have to scrutinize it further when I make my next online purchases and chuck it into Edge as I made that my dedicated shopping browser.

    • Electric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I always assumed it was a combination of your guess and companies giving Honey special coupon codes so consumers are more eager to spend.

      “Hey Honey, we’ll give you 1% commission if you just host this HONEY5 coupon for 5% off.”

      That was my impression when I used it once. Wasn’t worth having an extension just for a slight discount. Love when a company doesn’t fulfill the service they advertise.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        But that would be an ethical business model, we can’t have that, this is PayPal and this is the internet. There’s no place for ethics in that combination.

  • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Everybody: Fuck Peter Thiel, fuck Elon Musk, fuck Honey, Fuck PayPal

    Everybody: unflinchingly using PayPal

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I dunno, I stopped a while back, it wasn’t hard really. I’ve also heard that while they are usually fine with regular sums of money they are not to be trusted with large sums. Just word of mouth an I’ve got no proof but it put me off.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        There are some examples of buyers exploiting the returns policy for expensive items. The buyer initiates a return of item but never sends it, gets item and refund.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Deleted my ebay account but very rarely will buy on it. I’ve yet to find a UK alternative.

  • Electric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Pretty sure this was already posted yesterday when it came out. Or it might have been a different community.

    Watching the full video is important though because they are scamming the consumer too, not just “”“influencers”“”. Someone made a great comment about how it’s just one greedy troll stealing from another and has no effect on the consumer since they still save money but Honey not actually giving you the best coupons on purpose is next level dickholery.

    Lying about the coupons really should be the focus so people stop harming themselves using Honey.

    • kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s also kind of a protection racket against shops. “Partner with us or we’ll cut into your profits by spreading cheap coupon codes, but partner with us and we’ll protect you”

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I used Honey before thr PayPal purchase and it did have working discount codes, as well as a cashback thing that I redeemed a couple times. But I haven’t had any codes work for a long time.

      I don’t have any love for influencers but they have the right to make money IMO, and it’s completely shitty behavior for honey to be taking that away from them.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I never use affiliate links AND I don’t bother looking for coupons (let’s be honest, who does?) so I don’t give a crap, every now and then I’m saving money without taking it from anyone 🤷

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        idk, I find the coupon thing to be super easy. Just takes one search and maybe two clicks if you have ad blockers on. Mostly the only time is if I’m ordering something like pizza for a get together where no special applies. There’s a local chain in my state that had a coupon code for half off my order that wasn’t listed on their site (they might’ve given it to me if I called but who knows). Been using that for the past year and it allows me to convince everyone to go there instead of a national chain. I’ve also been lucky with some manufacturers coupons for products I’m ordering straight from them, it’s more rare though so it’s hit or miss sometimes.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I just look up price trends and that’s pretty much it for me too. Coupons rarely ever worked for me in the early days of e-commerce so I quickly stopped bothering.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      See, I’m torn. I’ve never used honey, so I was never scammed. However I do think them scamming consumers is awful.

      Buuuuuuuut, I DO enjoy the fact that they scammed influencers.

      • Electric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah I thought that too until seeing the bits about consumers getting shafted. Awful company, hope they get sued into bankruptcy.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They’re one of the largest tech media companies and deliberately chose to sweep this under the rug instead of reporting on it. Then they took sponsorships from Karma, which is a competitor to Honey that does the exact same thing.

      • Jin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        No, they are not one of largest tech media companies They have less than what 100 employees. Maybe you used the wrong term?

        When did they learn about it? Where your proof?

        • It’s the holidays and a lot of content of made awhile, I don’t expect them to make dedicated statement.
        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          First of all, Lemmy has a lot of users for whom English is a second language. So maybe don’t be a jackass about correcting grammar.

          Secondly, in case you happen to be in that group of people ‘largest media company’ in this context applies to their reach, and not to their actual size. They are ‘large’ because they have a large audience, generate a lot of revenue, and are worth a lot of money. LMG also comprises 10 different YouTube channels with maybe 10 billion views between them.

          • Jin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Look I’m not correcting grammar, I’m not native English speaker myself + I’m very dyslexic.

            But when someone says the biggest tech media companies, you put them in same category as Disney, Apple and so on, which makes them very small.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Sometimes people exaggerate and if you point out what they said is inaccurate then they get mad you’re not addressing their main point.

              • Jin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                People are going mad anyways, doesn’t really matter especially here on lemmy ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

                People are putting the blame on creators, instead of PayPal/honey, when creators are the victims too. We don’t know the full story from LLT from their side if “deliberately chose to sweep this under the rug instead of reporting on it

                If I’m questioning it, I’m going to get negative feedback because the narrative is they are to blame because they are “big”.

          • Jin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            I watched it, but I’ll reserve my judgment until the next wan show because I don’t know if it has been mentioned before on an earlier show or how the problem has been interpret by staff.

            • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              … Ok well here’s the link to the moment (in the video you watched) where we have one **staff ** member giving an official response to how LTT interpreted the problem in a forum post on their website.

              https://youtu.be/vc4yL3YTwWk?t=811

              And here’s a link to their youtube channel where they talk about honey

              https://www.youtube.com/@LinusTechTips/search?query=honey

              You’ll notice. There isn’t one.

              So for at least two years, they knew honey was stealing affiliate links and considered it a big enough problem to end their partnership, but did not consider it a big enough issue to make a video on it.

              • Jin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                I dunno why you keep sending me a bunch of text and videos. I’m going to wait until the next wan show, so I can understand what really happened inside.

                • whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  I’m down to listen to their response myself but as someone who tried really hard to explain away their last dumb controversy only to be proven wrong multiple times, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was just pure negligence. Actions speak louder than words and their actions have shown they’re a flawed company like any other despite what their conversations on WAN show would have you believe.

                  Fuck Honey/PayPal first and foremost, don’t get me wrong. But unless there were legal issues around it, we also can’t ignore it if the biggest tech YouTube channel found out about one of the biggest sponsors on YouTube being a scam, stopped working with them for that reason, but said absolutely nothing to anyone else.

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Agreed. I remember enjoying their workshop videos a long time ago, but they can’t even be trusted for PC building info, much less anything else.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Can we make a version of this add-on that replaces the links with a choice of charity links?

    Might as well do some good in the chaos of the internet.

  • criticon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I used honey for a while and it was working great for me with “exclusive” coupons and Cashback and then one time I bough a cellphone that was supposed to have $250 cashback. I did all the necessary steps, read the t&c, took screenshots of the offer and made the purchase. I never got the transaction to appear on their website. Sending emails it trying to contact them was futile (I even made an automatic script to send an email everyday to follow up). Fuck PayPal

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    If you’re sitting at a poker table and you can’t tell who the sucker is, it’s you.

    Alternately, if you look at an online service and can’t tell what the product is, It’s you.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I think the issue was with the original commenter’s phrasing. Facebook looks like a product. But the commenter meant “How the product is being funded”.

          Of course, it gets hard when there’s multiple sources of revenue. You used to be able to spot ads and come to the conclusion that that was everything. Now an ad is just the tip of the iceberg.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah, I feel like that’s usually a very accurate saying, but it doesn’t really work with a lot of open source projects.

        I hate that you’re getting downvoted by so many people who don’t realize you’re pointing out an exception to the rule, and instead think you have some fundamental misunderstanding about how Linux works.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          It’s difficult for others to take advantage of you when you can learn what the software actually does and have it modified to work another way.

          Linux (for the most part) is open source but I’d argue the inclusion of any proprietary software/firmware/drivers means it ultimately isn’t.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          They are getting downvoted for misconstruing something that is clearly a rule about profit making services and applying it to crowd sourced non-profit open source projects.

          Truly open source projects don’t have suckers.

          • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            misconstruing something that is clearly a rule about profit making services

            To be honest I don’t think that’s clear at all, it feels like it’s more a rule about being skeptical of free stuff online. And many for profit companies have open source projects that can be used safely even though the source is a for-profit.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I mean, yes?

        The key difference is linux wants you to help make it better. Something like Honey steals your data, and steals money from others, and then wants you to make it better.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Except Linux has proper legal underpinnings that anyone with a few brain cells can verify.

        You can compile your own code too

        Hence why people always say do your diligence

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      And even if you can tell what the product is, it‘s still often you. “Premium” subscriptions for example might hide (some) ads, but services still collect as much data about you. Even grocery stores where the offer seems obvious are trying to bait you into installing their apps to collect data on top of charging you for every item. And sure it’s not relevant in this case, but it’s something we should never forget.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      If only they had some medium to post the information, perhaps a medium that that VAST MAJORITY of their viewers use.

      “But the plans were on display…”

      “On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.”

      “That’s the display department.”

      “With a flashlight.”

      “Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”

      “So had the stairs.”

      “But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?”

      “Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

      • whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I knew this was Douglas Adams by the tone but had to look it up to realize it was Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Time for a re-read!

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        They’re complaint was that honey inserted their affiliate cookie even when they didn’t find a coupon code for you. I doubt they knew the full extent of the scam.

        Plus, we don’t know what was in their contract with honey. They could still be subject to a non-disparagment clause.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, that not nothing but it isn’t far off. They have a massive platform. It deserved at least a video telling people about it.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      They didn’t hide it, but a huge portion of their audience doesn’t read the forums. A 10 minute video of Linus ranting about them would have opened this scandal to a wider audience years ago.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        There may have been non-disclosure agreements between Linus tech tips and PayPal Honey. They may have threatened to sue him if he went public. I’m assuming we’ll find out the details in the next few weeks.

      • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Linus usually likes to rant about it on the WAN show then they usually make a clip for YouTube, but weird he didn’t do that for honey, maybe he didn’t know how far the scam went.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            non disparagement clause

            Not the level of a non-compete clause but that’s a scummy thing I hope is not legal.

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          As creator that makes some of their profits from affiliate links, I don’t see how that could be the case for him.

          Seems more likely they had a reason to avoid beef with PayPal.

        • whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Especially considering he hasn’t been shy about ranting about a lot of things from (insert latest apple thing) to “fucking eggshell”

    • poke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT. I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on, I think their forum post was good and I believe they even mentioned this functionality of Honey a few times on the WAN show. It wasn’t a secret, and anyone who cared to do in-depth research on a potential sponsor could have found out.

      • sardaukar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        And yet here’s the scandal being exposed TWO YEARS LATER. Yeah, LTT couldn’t possibly have handled this better… /s

        • poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          They told everyone and nobody cared, turns out people care if a YouTube video is made framing the same thing differently. Like yeah, Honey’s practice is bad for the creator industry, but is it bad enough to bring it back to the people who took their money? No, I don’t think so.I think this is more of an example of how easy it is to get the masses angry with a YouTube video than anything. It’s good that more people are going to move away from this information harvesting app, but I really feel like the reaction and hatred is overblown and, at least for the hatred towards creators, unwarranted.

          The way I see it, people still take money from predatory gambling sites, and if any creator deserves pushback, it’s them.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on

        Their viewers getting scammed by tech they promoted isn’t worth a video on their main channel? If they could legally do it I think they should have.

        Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT

        LTT have made mistakes but the dunking here does seem disproportionate.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I have been using PayPal increasingly for online payments. Not sure why. I have heard old stories about PayPal but Honey seems really bad. Its basically a given that any fintech company are going to be dodgy scammers but PayPal seemed almost grown up and respectable. Guess not.

    • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Maybe use privacy.com instead (they also have an app), they can generate virtual credit cards and you can set limit is (one time payment, or monthly $10 only, etc). It’s great if you need to cancel something or if they try to charge you extra. Saved me $150 when boost tried to charge me 1 year after I bought a phone from them!

      It’s also great for predatory services like GYM membership that you can’t cancel.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I use Klarna for basically everything I buy. I should probably reevaluate that. But I’ve had no issues so far. It notifies me when my payments are due. Helps me collect the sum of what I owe each month, each week. Helps me group payments to pay similar/connected things simultaneously, categorize purchases, etc, etc.

      I really hope there’s nothing dodgy going on there. But at least I’m not giving them interest on anything I buy. Always make sure I’m paying my stuff on time, and no postponed payments.

      I’m guessing their business model is to exploit people who have issues paying on time and to collect interest and late fees, as well as receive convenience fees from stores implementing Klarna as a payment option.

      • kchr@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I really hope there’s nothing dodgy going on there

        In 2023 they got a 1.1 million SEK fine for breaking the law that regulates working hours. To “allow” (strongly encourage) your employees to work nightshifts you need a collective agreement approved by the union, which they didn’t have.

        More recently, they got a 500 million SEK fine for skirting the anti-money laundering regulations in Sweden.

        But at least I’m not giving them interest on anything I buy. Always make sure I’m paying my stuff on time, and no postponed payments.

        The whole “buy now, pay later” deal is a credit loan. They are most likely paying the merchant directly and using your loan as collateral to speculate on the market, until you pay them back for that loan. If that’s true, they are making profit on the interest gained from your loan.

        I’m guessing their business model is to exploit people who have issues paying on time and to collect interest and late fees, as well as receive convenience fees from stores implementing Klarna as a payment option.

        Correct. Like all credit banks they promote the “buy now, pay later” option before direct payment, which is becoming a pandemic on our society. Hardly any user interaction needed. They also offer their own payment plans which encourages buying even more expensive items you cannot afford.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          The whole “buy now, pay later” deal is a credit loan. They are most likely paying the merchant directly and using your loan as collateral to speculate on the market, until you pay them back for that loan. If that’s true, they are making profit on the interest gained from your loan.

          I’m not very educated in economics, so I’m struggling to understand this. Is there a way to easily explain this? I’m 38 so… please use big words if you like, but simple domain language. 😅

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      OP isn’t exactly giving you the full story there. I know for a fact I’ve seen a video on this. I remember thinking at the time “well duh”.

    • galanthus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It was a matter of time until the public found out about this. They couldn’t think in the long term, by not accepting a bit of backlash, exposing the scam they unknowingly participated in they only opened themselves up for more later.

      They are not only evil, they are stupid too, which is worse.

      • themakara@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Have you ever heard his full stance on the matter? Because he clearly stated that this is not a judgment against using it. Heck, he’s been open about having sailed the high seas himself and still doing so for media he physically owns.

        It’s just that gaining access to media while circumventing the payment (ads in this case) is basically piracy. Which is fair.

        Signed, A uBlock User

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I trust Linus is being sincere when he says “it’s not a judgement” but blocking ads is being compared to a criminal doing copyright infringement (illegal). The word used is one originally meaning for a person murdering others on boats (immoral), and it’s used because it’s pejorative. It’s unavoidably judgemental.

        • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          How much you want to bet he uses Ad block himself but it’s suddenly different when YOU do it on HIS content?

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        It…is? You’re copying digital content without paying for it. I use uBlock but I don’t pretend to have the moral high ground.

      • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        It is. Taking from a service without paying for it, and actively avoiding the service making money via advertising is basically the same as watching a film without paying for it.

        Both ways, you consumed a service and the people providing it got nothing, but it cost them something to create and provide it.