• Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Censorship disguised as moderation. This is exactly what killed reddit. You can’t have a discussion over there without getting banned, it’s just individual echo chambers who all censor and ban each other

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Or, hear me out, maybe people were tied of way too many posts in the community being about recent politics, so moderators took action on that?

      It’s not a good look to be broadly banning those words, but it seems to me like there’s a reasonable and obvious expansion.

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        that’s easily dissuaded by no re-posts or reddits algorithm burying those. The problem was more likely because they were popular and highly engaged so they had to step in. Fucking “spez” is in there and you still feel the need to play devil’s advocate?

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s just a list of nouns and proper nouns. Depending on what your post is, it could be a very unpopular opinion! Censoring words is why I won’t ever go back to Reddit…

        • frazorth@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t know about that. People post obviously popular opinions repeatedly if they aren’t banned.

          Unpopular opinion, but I dislike the top ten Christmas songs

          Yeah, no shit. Even though they are the “top ten”.

    • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hate to break it to you but reddit isn’t dead.

      I still go on reddit. In a lot of ways it’s a lot worse than it used to be. It’s way more corporate. Huge portions of the site seem sanitized, often in obvious and eyeroll inducing ways. There’s also a lot less content in general. The content that does exist is lower effort, and way more repetitive.

      However in some ways it’s genuinely better. The discourse is a lot less toxic than it used to be. A lot of genuine cruelty wrapped in virtue signaling that defined the site from 2018 to 2022 is either gone or greatly diminished. It’s also slightly less of an echo chamber.

      I think what happened is that after the mobile apocalypse, a lot of the power users left the platform. While these people contributed a lot to the site, they were also extremely toxic people with an even more warped worldview.

      The mods are a reflection of this. They are more corporate, which leads to a lot of censorship like this. However it also means that scrolling is quite a bit more pleasant.

      Overall I spend more time on Reddit than Lemmy. There’s very little content here once you filter out all the outrage bait.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        You may be on the wrong communities, i could waste a day here. I actually use reddit for ragebait (i just can’t quit aitah)

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    “Mario’s brother”

    “The Mansion Owner”

    “Splattered Brain Thompson”

    “CE Oh shit the consequences of my actions!”

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      That part is the exact same and worse here. Lemmy is not really decrentralized, it’s just fractured. Each community still have just one “big one” by design.

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Difference between Reddit and Lemmy is that you can legit say “I’ll start my own Lemmy, with blackjack and hookers” and expect it to make an impact.

        Whereas with Reddit, whatever Spez says is law, even if it’s as consistent as bird shit on a car windscreen.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          “I’ll start my own Lemmy, with blackjack and hookers” and it will have the same systemic structure that perpetuates underhanded unaccountable shadow moderation and the concentration of power into the hand of a few individuals who just happened to be at the right place at the right time and cannot realistically be avoided or dislodged until an absolutely monumental fuckup on their part that it can’t be ignored.

          It’s becoming clear that Lemmy is not in any way the safe haven it has been marketed as. And this NFT rigamarole certainly isn’t going to be that either.

          Anything that doesn’t put the ENTIRE content discovery engine fully in the hands of the users and that doesn’t make content moderation a crowdsourced-only transparent, auditable endeavor is going to reproduce l’ancien régime.

          • mastazi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Lemmy is not in any way the safe haven it has been marketed as.

            Marketed? Lemmy is not a company and there is no marketing department. Generally, what you know about Lemmy is word of mouth from people who used it before you. No one controls the narrative in the end.

          • PiperTheJournalist@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Do you know how shit Lemmy could be if some hexbear tankies could come into your community and brigade it until they’ve banned half the users?

            Or the flipside, it’s a process that involves weeks of voting and you’ve got CP plastered all over the front page while you wait to reach enough votes to trigger its removal.

            Moderators exist to fill a role, that is the need for immediate action. Communities should be involved in decision making around rules, but you need people on hand to take responsibility and keep shit running. The benefit of Lemmy is that if you don’t like it, you can go create your own instance or community, without being subjected to a singular owner; that’s the issue it was solving, not your terrible one.

          • imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Anything that doesn’t put the ENTIRE content discovery engine fully in the hands of the users and that doesn’t make content moderation a crowdsourced-only transparent, auditable endeavor is going to reproduce l’ancien régime.

            Aren’t you just describing Lemmy?

            Content discovery is fully in the hands of the users, and content moderation is both crowd-sourced and transparent.

            Upvotes, downvotes, and reports are all forms of crowd sourced moderation. The modlog is transparent and auditable. What are you on about?

          • Clbull@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Instances are moderated by their moderators. Other instances that would rather not associate with a different instance can withdraw federation. I think the system works fine.

        • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Coming to a platform started by leftists and MLs and expecting sympathy for mass murderers because they have a C class job title is on you guys tbh.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Bruh their point is literally “nothing interesting because people keep repeating slogans without even reading or understanding”. And you keep doing it.

            Nobody said anything about CEOs. You added your own narrative.

            • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              It reads to me that they are complaining about the number and nature of Lemmy posts around topics featured in the image, captioned Luigi and largely revolving around the actions he took against a CEO. Im also tired of seeing people complain / Pearl clutch about the one time americans got close to class consciousness.

            • Ledivin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Nobody said anything about CEOs. You added your own narrative.

              Nobody except for literally the post that you’re commenting on? You know, the entire basis of the forum that you’re participating in?

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                I’m commenting on the comment chain. The post is about banning keywords. The chain is about Lemmy droning on about the same topics without anything new to say. There is nothing about billionaires here, yet the one I responded to had to make it about that, proving the OP right, then going deeper in.

  • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Is this really so bad? I mean… I get it. When you’re trying to moderate something with thousands of posts, and a ton start coming in that are low effort/bot posts saying things like “unpopular opinion: I support Luigi” or “unpopular opinion: I am glad Biden won’t be president” it makes sense. Those are just such constant topics with such a wide range of ideals. Whereas an unpopular opinion they might want to spur conversation would be “unpopular opinion: I don’t mind my socks being damp or wet” otherwise it’s just constant shitposts.

    Plus, Reddit isn’t the (US) government. Your expectation of free speech should be null.

    • DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s part of a larger trend of social media blackouts, this is bad because it lets the wealthy control our discource in the furtherance of their oligarchic aims.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Plus, Reddit isn’t the (US) government.

      When your policy is so bad your only defense of it is “technically we didn’t violate your civil rights”, maybe reconsider it.

      • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Your rights as a person and citizen don’t magically extend everywhere. Otherwise you turn into a sovereign citizen. This weird obsession on Lemmy with this idea you should be able to say whatever you want online anywhere is fucking stupid and weird. A website is like another business or home (or even a newspaper… which at times has also pulled ideas they don’t agree with). You’re showing up to it. If you don’t like the rules in one place, go to another (or read a different paper). Or make your own.

        Also, I love the irony of me making an unpopular opinion comment on a post about unpopular opinion.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          What you miss is people aren’t arguing from a constitutional perspective. They’re saying that it’s fucking ridiculous that sites like reddit censor perfectly legal speech while also billing themselves as bastions of free speech.

          There is a certain logic to it. If you want to bill your site as a public square, then maybe you shouldn’t censor anything other than speech that is actually illegal. It is not illegal to say things in support of Luigi Mangione. In fact, it’s perfectly legal, and totally Constitutionally protected, for me to go right now and hold a big sign in front of NYPD headquarters saying, “Luigi Mangione is a saint, and I hope to see a hundred more like him!” The law restricts true threats, but those are defined way, way narrower than many on social media seem to think.

          People aren’t saying that reddit or other platforms can’t censor content on their platform, they obviously can. But you also shouldn’t bitch about people pointing out the rank hypocrisy of sites that bill themselves as public squares censoring content to serve their corporate overlords.

          • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            I don’t disagree with some of your points, but I also don’t believe that Reddit really ever said it was a free speech platform. Twitter has for sure (because of Elon), but Reddit has really been a “front page of the internet” believer. They felt more like an aggregator and newspaper. Which definitely has a lot of censoring and opinion blocking in the world of print too. I mean, remember when they got rid of jailbait or space dicks, was that a speech problem? Some felt it was, but it was definitely something we all realized was wrong and that a private company tries to protect its “brand.” Obviously being on Lemmy and leaving after the API change means I didn’t agree with them and I found another place that aligned more with my values.

            You holding that sign up though is legal, however only on public property, and only if you’re taking up less than half of the sidewalk and not in the path of traffic. You also cannot use an amplified device (unless you’ve filled out the permit) and your sign cannot be on any wood or metal sticks. If you step onto private property you can be asked to leave or removed. That last one is also something that just like a website isn’t restricting your right to free speech, just that a specific building/business/owner doesn’t want to be in support of it.

            In the end, why are we all still talking about Reddit. This site definitely has users that love going back to their crazy ex to fuck and then realizing it’s still crazy like as if it would change.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          This weird obsession on Lemmy with this idea you should be able to say whatever you want online anywhere is fucking stupid and weird.

          I don’t think talking about current events in a shit posting sub rises to the level of “weird obsession”.

          • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            If we’re talking about the Unpopular opinion subreddit (what the image is from). They also had President, presidency, Trump, and spez. They’re just big things that end up with a lot of garbage. A sub about unpopular opinions filled with the same “Donald Trump bad” becomes boring and annoying.

            If we’re talking about the Lemmy Shitpost community then they specifically call out no derogatory language towards anyone’s Race, gender, or religion. Is that trampling your civil liberties?

  • Sternburgexport@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Turns out hating on conservatists and praising ceo killers is too much of a popular opinion for that sub, is that what they want to say?