Or, hear me out, maybe games should just sell you a good product at a fair price rather than trying to manipulate you into playing it longer than you enjoy it for.
Only timed battle passes manipulate you into playing it more than you enjoy it for. The ones in Helldivers 2 never expire so if you were to get bored of the game you can just stop playing. Then come back to the game a year later and continue on where you left off.
They have rewards tied to grinding out the game’s content as opposed to just buying the rewards directly to play with in the game’s content, right? I’d say that’s the difference. In Magicka, I bought costumes that had different gameplay mechanics tied to them, and I could use them right away. But for business reasons, live service games create incentives to keep you playing longer than you would otherwise.
They have rewards tied to… playing the game. Just like every other video game ever made. That’s how video games work. The only way for there to be “an incentive to keep playing beyond when you want to” is by making the additional content limited in time to generate FOMO or worry that you’ll have wasted your money… which in this case is not happening at all. There is no FOMO because you can buy any of the war bonds whenever you want, and complete them whenever you want. You paid money for something you will keep forever. That’s how it’s supposed to be. That is literally the best possible approach to new content. By your reasoning, every video game ever made is manipulative because they made the game and put… content in it to get you to play the game more than before you bought the game.
“Buying the rewards directly to play in the game” on the other hand is the wrong approach. Why would you prefer to play the game less? If you don’t want to be playing the game why are you spending more money on it?
Just because they removed the FOMO part doesn’t mean it isn’t manipulative, and this game is also online only, so by design, you will not keep it forever, once again, because that’s the business model of a live service game.
The game I’ve put the most time into, on Steam at least, is Skullgirls. It has no progression whatsoever. I play the same content over and over because I enjoy it. If you enjoy playing the same Helldivers II content over and over, awesome. These systems are designed to get people to play less content for more time though. Perhaps not you, if that content hasn’t worn out its welcome for you yet, but the person who would have otherwise put the game down earlier.
The person who put the game down earlier because they are bored of the game is not going to spend money on additional content that they aren’t interested in playing. And if they do, and have fun, then they aren’t being manipulated. They’re having fun with a product they purchased (just like all video games). Removing the FOMO part absolutely means it isn’t manipulative because that is quite literally the only thing that makes battle passes manipulative in the first place. For you to argue against this is to argue that all video games are manipulative because they were all created to get you to play them more than before you were before you bought them.
The game I’ve put the most time into, on Steam at least, is Skullgirls. It has no progression whatsoever.
Not true, there are a couple of characters you unlock story modes for after beating it with other characters. Guess you’re being manipulated into playing the game more, huh?
This argument of yours is completely devoid of any rational thought.
No characters’ story modes are locked in Skullgirls. What are you talking about? You’re choosing not to see the game you like as having a manipulative business model. Why do you think the costumes in Magicka didn’t have a battle pass tied to them but Helldivers II does?
That’s the whole point of gamification mechanics, there’s a fine line between grind and good gameplay which needs to be masterfully balanced
For me grind is when the gameplay loop is motivated by reward not exploration and plays out the same every time.
Good gameplay can come from a feeling of freshness because there are lots of possibilities, because rng or because player options (say, slay the spire), or from lots of genuinely novel content (say, elden ring).
It doesn’t feel like a balancing act at all. I just want more of the latter and less of the former, but maybe some people really do play for repetition?
They don’t need to gamify something that’s already a fun game.
Interesting how bad online gaming got, that articles like this one exist. Content of a game you bought not vanishing after a few months is revolutionary, just wow.
Halo Infinite did it before either tbf
Halo Infinite: Post-season 5, battle passes are now free during their introductory season, but cost $5 to unlock afterward
Marvel Rivals: Battle passes will not expire if you bought the $10 Luxury pass during the season
These are not FOMO-less. Marvel Rivals sounds like the worst of the three in that regard. The ‘old’ method incentivized you to skip buying a battle pass if you weren’t going to finish it (because you’d lose rewards); MR’s system gives you a FOMO CTA to make that purchase to stop you from losing rewards.
Compare this to, say, Dead By Daylight, where there’s “seasons” with unlockable rewards, you can get them for free, and you can keep unlocking them after the season ends.
Nothing inside a video game should cost real money.
No digital product should ever disappear forever.
I don’t think I’ve ever purchased a battle pass and I don’t plan to. I think if a game I was interested in offered one, I’d consider just skipping it.
If no one bought the things they’d stop making them, but that is an impossible idea.