Despite Microsoft’s push to get customers onto Windows 11, growth in the market share of the software giant’s latest operating system has stalled, while Windows 10 has made modest gains, according to fresh figures from Statcounter.

This is not the news Microsoft wanted to hear. After half a year of growth, the line for Windows 11 global desktop market share has taken a slight downturn, according to the website usage monitor, going from 35.6 percent in October to 34.9 percent in November. Windows 10, on the other hand, managed to grow its share of that market by just under a percentage point to 61.8 percent.

The dip in usage comes just as Microsoft has been forcing full-screen ads onto the machines of customers running Windows 10 to encourage them to upgrade. The stats also revealed a small drop in the market share of its Edge browser, despite relentlessly plugging the application in the operating system.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    im forced to use it at work and holy shit. 11 is so heavy for no reason, 8gb of ram is not remotely enough anymore.

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    If Microsoft really wants people to switch to Windows 11 they need to retain many of the already few remaining customization options from Windows 10. Trackpad gesture support is worse, the only useful button in the new right click menu is the show more one which brings back the old menu but requires an extra click, and the file explore somehow got even more buggy. I hate every time I need to interact with a computer using Windows 11.

    Luckily there’s been an initiative within my company recently to support Linux, so I’m hoping that all the network related issues are fully worked out before Windows 11 is forced on us so I can just jump ship to Ubuntu.

  • hsakaa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    I am 21 and have been a windows user since I was 6. Windows 10 was the last windows OS I ever used and after that used linux for a while and eventually switched to Mac, and I am glad I did. Windows 11 has a bunch of visual upgrades which just ruin the experience and makes it difficult to navigate around. Also the fact that I need to purchase a new laptop to be able to use it when my old one is perfectly fine.

      • hsakaa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        I did, and about an year ago my laptop broke and my brother had been using a Macbook Pro from 2017, which still works just great, which hasn’t been the case for most windows laptops which are just as old in my experience.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I still fail to see how windows 11 was anything but a collusion scam to sell new hardware.

    None of the changes including TPM requirements required a new iteration. Nothing about the underlying NT dropped any of the old and antiquated BS despite Microsoft hiring some morons to advertise the fact on reddit to all the insiders asking questions.

    They even let the media pick up a fake report that Windows 11 was related to the Core OS and a brand new kernel was in the works.

    If Microsoft wanted a marketing strategy, they could have properly started naming feature updates and adverising them similar to Apple.

    8, 10, and 11 have also been a pain on enterprise because Microsoft axed their QA team. I seriously hope any new firms start considering linux desktop as a valid option. All they really need is a vendor to offer a solid distro along with an agreement to rapidly create/deploy any software solution so they don’t get scared looking at the cheap entry windows stuff.

  • Oaksey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I had to make the change to Windows 11 at work, it was certainly a downgrade. Pretty common that there is a massive wait for even the most simple applications to load. Quite often I end up opening multiple copies, because I think the first click to open didn’t register, click again and they all open at once. This is on the same hardware that Windows 10 did fine on.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I don’t understand how Windows 11 file system/explorer just chugs so much. If you have a folder with more than a dozen or so files, it’s optional whether anything will load or not. Everything about Windows 11 is leaning into the worst aspects of windows 10, without any benefit.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    When games work so well on Linux these days, it seems to me that there is absolutely no reason for Windows to exist anymore. Why does anyone use it?

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Hardware support is still an issue. I recently tried to use Linux on my laptop, it didn’t work out primarily because not all of the hardware was supported. I thought it was when I bought the laptop but the documentation of what actually works and doesn’t work isn’t clear or accurate so I ended up with a laptop that can technically run Linux but has various hardware in it will not function and likely never will.

    • Zement@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I am used to it. I don’t like the app store of Ubuntu and manually installing software on Linux is vastly different.

      But Win11 is forcing me to Ubuntu. It’s the same but with commercials.

        • Zement@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          I don’t want an app store. But I don’t want to jump through too many hoops when installing Software. I like the “Installer” concept.

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Ease of installing I would say. Most people do not need nor want to learn how to install stuff using terminal. An app store is necessary for your regular Joe using the Operating system.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            You don’t always need the terminal. If the software is available in a deb package, you just double click it and hit Install. But, you’re right, most people don’t want to learn apt or any other command, and I get that.

            Edit: Autocorrect

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            There are decent GUI installers for most, if not all, major Linux distros. They may not be as full-featured as the CLI versions, but they are sufficient for average users.

    • Tristus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Main reason would be “why not?” windows is also working great for most common use cases. Actually there is not much difference nowadays between OSes. Another reason would be specific software like Excel. Why would you switch your OS adlnd most of the software you use if you don’t gain much from it.

      I’ve a Linux OS for coding, OSX for work and Windows for gaming. There are absolutely no problems with any of them. Windows worked great last 4 years, no virusesor performance issues without anti-virus or tweaking. Linux drivers needed work at the start but now there is no issues, Mac is similar. Only issue is when I try to code with Windows it feels annoying but it is mostly because I’m doing things with CLI where I should have used GUI.

      • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Never had a problem with Reshade. You could use steamtinkerlaunch to do it more easily or just config Wine to overwrite the .dll needed for Reshade(I think is the dxgi.dll).

        If that doesn’t work you can pass a argument on steam/gog/lutris/heroic/whatever to replace the .dll. I’m linking a guide to mod Cyberpunk 2077 on linux but the instructions works for any game and any .dll just change the name.

      • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Not needed, many VR games work fine under Proton. Unlike desktop though, not “plug and play”. If you’re ready to spend time troubleshooting, give Linux VR a try with SteamVR or Monado through Envision. If you just want to play VR, stick to Windows for now.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Yes, you can technically get some games working. If you use the right VR headset (meaning Valve Index or Vive), use the right distro, with the right compositor and right GPU, spend a lot of time troubleshooting, then you can maybe get a few games to start. Camera passthrough won’t work, power management won’t work (no control for base stations), Bluetooth won’t work, tracking won’t be as good, you will experience weird bugs and crashes of both the games and SteamVR, and you will get less FPS than on Windows. And even with that inferior experience, most games still won’t run.

          I spent a lot of time trying despite this being the experience for most people online, and I only confirmed that it’s the case. Windows is absolutely needed if you want a good experience. Hopefully Valve changes that in the future, but that’s the case today.

          • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            Not entirely. SteamVR on Linux is almost that bad, yes. With ALVR you can try to use standalones on SteamVR, but it’s not very stable. Most games will “run” under SteamVR and modern proton, I’ve only encountered a few situations where they don’t, once again caused by kernel level anticheat. SteamVR does have major issues with stability and reprojection, which makes the VR experience much worse overall.

            However, Monado and WiVRN (+ OpenComposite) are great when using Envision. Not all games run, and some have input issues, but it’s significantly better than SteamVR. With a couple overlays, you can get most functions working as expected, like desktop view, camera passthrough, etc.

            As for “power management” and “bluetooth”, the only thing the Valve Index uses bluetooth for is power management. That doesn’t work in the drivers on Linux, but there are scripts you can use if you have a separate bluetooth dongle. It’s not a full fix, but not as painful as using an Android app or unplugging the basestations.

            As we both noted, it requires setup and troubleshooting, and as someone who uses Linux for VR gaming too, I can’t recommend it to the average person. That does not make Windows a “requirement”, just much easier and the better plug and play experience.

            • dev_null@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              Sure, as I said “Windows is absolutely needed if you want a good experience”. Yes, it’s not required to get something working if you try hard enough, but it is required if you want everything to work well.

              I keep a Windows virtual machine with GPU passthrough for VR and don’t see myself ditching it any time soon. At least I don’t need to boot into Windows.

      • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Aw shit! Thought there was nothing left that would keep me from completely ditching windows (htpc, pihole, homelab … everything but my workstation is Linux already). I recently got a headset tho and quite enjoy it… What a bummer :(

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Especially for buisnesses its hard to switch. A lot of specialised software is not supported on Linux and often there isn’t any form of good replacement.

    • themaninblack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Just switched from win 10 to Linux mint today. Feels good, games running faster than before even. The only thing that doesn’t work is the invasive anti cheat shit for multiplayer games. But I get merked every time in multiplayer so screw it

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Who thought that puting ridiculous minimum requirements so your spyware can work better would mean that lots of people without newer hardware just won’t upgrade.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        its funny since windows me was just windows 2000 but worse since they didnt have to worry about business customers

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Windows ME was actually some Windows 2000 bits glued onto Windows 98. That’s why it was so terrible, it was kind of an afterthought when initial plans for ‘2k for everyone’ got abandoned as they realized the home app ecosystem needed more compatibility workarounds than they were prepared to offer. So instead of completing the 2k based product line, they just '2k’ed up Win98 to satisfy their then-current release cadence and make sure home market had a ‘current’ OS to go with the 2k professional line.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      As much as I loved 2000, XP was better and 7 the best ever.

      2000 was the pioneer though, it was such a huge step forward in every way

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Yes, Win2k, WinXP, and Win7 were all major leaps forward in various areas. Imagine if 8 had been just a major cleanup of Windows 7 and unifying the various settings paradigms, how much better that would have been.

        • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Windows 8 was actually a big cleanup over 7. We got a much improved task manager, Explorer got a ribbon, copy operations now showed a graph, and performance was very similar to Win7. It was just that Microsoft overshadowed these improvements with the UI disaster and telemetry.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          But alas, Windows 8 was the ‘oh crap, tablets and phones might eat our lunch’ release and the focus was throwing the desktop/laptop experience under the bus to try to cater to sensibilities of markets they were never going to capture. Also, to have their own ‘app store’ to try to wrestle a google/apple like revenue model for applications running on the platform.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            If MS had put any focus on allowing skins/themes for Windows, the touch market would have just been an extra feature. There is no technical reason they couldn’t have, as evidenced by the third-party apps that allowed legacy skins on previous versions, such as 8 and 10. But they needed that lock-in and forced experience, rather than giving people the choice.

      • jas0n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Long time Linux user here. The smoothest OS I’ve ever used was xp64. That just ran like butter. Unfortunately, it was killed off to push people to Vista.

  • kazerniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’ll stick to Win10 until the end of the support period, just like how I stuck to Win7 as long as I could 😬 That was still my favourite OS, loved Aero 🥺

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’ve been apprehensive to all kinds of adverts for years, I guess the general population is catching up to me on this trend.

  • EvilZ@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Announcing in 2025

    Windows Buntu we bring the U in Windows … Actually that would be nice for Ubuntu to slowly suffocate and take over Windows lol

  • Codex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    The dip in usage comes just as Microsoft has been forcing full-screen ads onto the machines of customers running Windows 10 to encourage them to upgrade.

    Yeah no shit! When my computer does full-screen, disruptive things that I didn’t tell it to do, I figure out how to remove that malware. I’ve been off Windows at home for about a month now, thanks Linux Mint! Getting some games to work has been challenging, but most things have just worked and quite a few work much better!

    Performance is up overall, and my confidence that my computer isn’t running a bunch of secret ad and spy ware is way up. Hardware like my gamepad and microphone would randomly disconnect and have issues on Windows, all working perfectly now.

    Unfortunately I’m still deep in MS land for work, but there’s almost a comedic quality to it. Everything’s very slow, everyone has constant issues with Teams, or Office online, or Dynamics, or copilot shoving it’s tendrils into everything. Watching businesses struggle to keep operating in the face of Microsoft’s inadequacy is like being a mechanic watching a motor grind to a halt because the owner/manufacturer replaced all the oil with syrup.

    Like yes, it’s my problem to fix, but I’m just glad it’s not my car.