• derek@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Your statement is too vague to convey an actionable suggestion. I’m intrigued by the thought you seem to be hinting at. Would you expand on this, include a recommended method, and reason about why it’s an alternative to violence?

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m very tired and had a long day so I’ll keep it short:

        A lot of people (myself included) have difficulty listening to authorities. But if i can see the deeper meaning and benefit of a rule, it’s easy for me to keep to it. That is what i mean by putting “meaning(ful rules) into the world”.

        On the other hand, if somebody gives out commands without explaining the reasoning behind them, i will often complain, revolt or otherwise try to undermine the authority. That is what i mean by “violence leads to counterviolence”.

        I hope that was clear enough.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Violence is bad” statements are in the same vein as “stove is hot”. Both are told to children because they cannot properly gauge the consequeces of using it, but are naive and condescending when told to adults.

  • PineRune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Violence is not the answer” says country that won its place in the world through violence.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Native Americans would have been much better off if they had simply strangled Columbus and all his crew the moment they made landfall…

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I get the humor in what you say, but it’s worth noting that the Native American civilizations were collapsing due to disease brought by earlier European visitors by the time Columbus set sail.

            Granted, history probably would’ve been largely the same if Columbus’ expeditions were unsuccessful, given the English, French, Dutch and Spanish appetites for empire building

            • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              There’s a saga that is about “what if Columbus arrived to America but never got back to Europe?”. It’s “the tale of the feathered serpent”.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a double edged sword, because people who you don’t agree with will resort to violence as well. Like the Taliban.

  • Alex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For sane news, that covers important domestic and international news on a daily basis, look at PBS Newshour or Democracy Now on YouTube. Sane. Journalistic. Thoughtful.

    Abandon the legacy billionaire media, but don’t abandon journalism.

      • RadiantLuminous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Because you’re a rightfully pissed off woman who had her claim denied and spouted off over the phone, you will now be charged for using terroristic language against a poor, defenseless corporation and your bail is $100,000. But that dude who killed a homeless man on the NYC subway? Well, boys will be boys.”