Let’s have a lunch and learn!

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I heard “rightsizing” for the first time last year.

    I have no idea what knucklehead PR dumbass came up with that but it made the following layoffs even more unpalatable.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The only time I hear rightsizing is for cloud resources. I’ve never heard of it in human resources. That sucks.

  • SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Good catch!”

    Usually said when you bring up something that needs fixing, and said as a way to puff you up and not actually follow up on the problem.

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Alright, team, let’s circle back and ensure we’re fully aligned on our north star objectives. We need to leverage synergy, engage in blue-sky thinking, and touch base on our pain points to drive mission-critical outcomes. But let’s not boil the ocean with unnecessary jargon - at the end of the day, we need to optimize our bandwidth for real, value-driven impact. If we keep moving the needle with this kind of thought leadership theater, we risk losing sight of our core competencies and drowning in a sea of meaningless buzzwords. Let’s pivot toward clear, actionable insights and sunset the overuse of strategic messaging before it becomes a blocker to true innovation. Instead of just playing the fast-follow game with every trending framework, let’s focus on original, high-impact execution that actually drives results.

    Thoughts? Chris, do you have any builds?

    No?

    Good. Then let’s action this and drive it across the finish line!

    • GlenRambo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But specifically “How could we use AI?”. If you dont know you don’t need it. Also looking st you big tech.

  • jade52@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 hours ago
    1. Alignment
    2. Scalable
    3. Circle back

    If you use these regularly I KNOW the meeting you just booked me into should have been an email.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Huh why scalable? I feel like that applies to a lot of things, not just the corporate world.

      • jade52@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I can’t remember last time I heard someone use it in a normal conversation, but in the corporate world I find it gets incredibly overused.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I guess it doesn’t bug me so much because it’s not so cringe and actually clearly communicates the point. We do in-house video editing at the company I work at, and when we talk about scaling we’re talking about making sure our processes hold when we add more and more people and increase our volume. It’s a growing company so I have to constantly talk about anticipating and buying things to make sure we don’t run into a wall with our growth.

          I guess this is less pushing back and more asking what word you would rather see?

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        I wouldn’t actually mind “circle back” if it wasn’t just used as cover to kick the can down the road.

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        I always want to do things by email instead of a meeting, but have to admit the meeting is often necessary. Of course it wouldn’t be if people could actually read and comprehend a detailed email and if they could also actually communicate information into writing without expecting you to be their minds enough to make sense of the incomplete vague phases they hurriedly type.

      • jade52@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I spend more time in meetings talking about the work I’m going to do, than doing the actual fucking work.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Bro I have my first “big company” job after working smaller places for over a decade. This feels so real. I’m dying.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Unless there is a need for faster communication or because it covers a topic that people have strong emotions about and need to see how others respond so they don’t assume the other person’s feelings about something. There are some cases where humans, being social animals, do need some interaction beyond words to accomplish coordinated tasks.

        The vast majority of meetings should be emails though. Just wish people actually read emails…

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    “Tribal knowledge.”

    • image: We, clan. Together, strong.
    • reality: Ask Tommy if he remembers how to reset the printer

    Though, I actually like this one. It’s a pretty cool phrase you can use anywhere.

  • KammicRelief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This isn’t strictly corpo-speak, but upper mgmt type people do this a lot:
    Misuse of the word “myself.” Like, “if you have any questions, talk to Joe or myself.”
    Nice one dumb-ass–you tried to sound smarter by adding syllables but it didn’t work, did it!

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    People saying something needs to be flushed out when they really want it fleshed out.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Lmao!

      I’d ask if they want me to get rid of it.

      I also have a colleague who refers to Apple computers as MAC, and has at least once asked for MAC addresses of some devices when what she meant was IP addresses last associated with the devices.

    • ghost_towels@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      We’re like family is a HUGE red flag for me. I had a boss use that as a selling feature to get me to work there. I had come from a place that really was like a family, a nice one, where we all really cared about each other. Turns out she meant it in the unpaid slave labour way. You can’t make a group of people a “family”, it has to grow that way Crystal. And not through pain and suffering!

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      “High energy multitasker”

      “Detail oriented”

      “Fast paced environment”

      Translates to: “You will be simultaneously micromanaged and expected to know everything with no prior documentation, and you will be underpaid for your efforts. We also have no organization whatsoever :)))”

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        “Fast paced environment” is the one that always gets me, because that’s just explicitly admitting that their organization is a total clusterfuck but somehow this inevitably gets put in the bullet points list because some bozo apparently thinks this is a positive thing that will make people want to work wherever-it-is.

        All it means is that you’d better show up wearing roller skates because management is going to expect you to be in three places at once all the time.