• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It obviously won’t get close to passing but it would be incredible for Democrats if it did. He has zero margin in the House, nothing major is passing into law except tax cuts. All his executive order policies are inflationary.

    So either he’s crashing the economy, taking the blame for continued inflation, or getting nothing of consequence done. And he’d be 83 and asking for four more years. He’d get crushed.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      We’ve played this game twice now. Let’s not try a third game of fascism chicken

      That said Obama vs trump would be a funny campaign. “My fellow Americans, look at this absolute buffoon. You want proof I’m a natural born citizen? I’ve been stuck here with him too.”

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That was one race, and during a pandemic that probably would have lost the race for any incumbent, whether it made logical sense or not.

          Frankly I kind of wish he won his second term if he had to get another term at all. His bruised ego over losing, fear of legal consequences, and time away to stew on this have made him a far more dangerous president than last time.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          And while i think he’d struggle in that scenario I’ve gotten very wary of people (myself included) thinking “he can’t possibly win in this scenario” because that’s twice now been the prelude to defeat. Wheras in 2020 he was taken as a serious threat from the start

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Of course he will wreck the rather healthy US economy and break the unemployment record again, which he currently holds from his 1st term.

    • psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And we were all overreacting about Roe v Wade. “Precedent”, “established law”, “checks and balances”. It could never happen, they said.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I really would like to see some of those checks and balances I’ve heard so much about. Must have gotten confused—it’s cheques for the rich, on our dime, to make their balance keeps going up.

    • TiaNati@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That’s a really dangerous way of thinking. We can no longer normalize this stuff by going “it’ll never actually happen.” It CAN happen. Get your head out of the sand and stop minimizing the very real threat our democracy is facing.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        What democracy? We’ve been living in a police state our entire lives. Talk about a dangerous way of thinking, ffs, how many hundreds of thousands of people were murdered under the Bush administration alone, and you act like that was just healthy democracy? Why were Bush and Obama on the same page about the erosion of our civil liberties and global imperialism? I swear, some of you are just miles from the correct explanation.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        This one won’t happen though. It doesn’t have the votes. It would require a Constitutional amendment, and thus a LOT of Democrats on board.

        You can’t freak out about every possible thing.

    • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Reminder that they control all branches of government and can do whatever the hell they want.

      Even though I partially agree that it’s probably somebody sucking up instead of them passing a “remove all term limits” bill instead.

      Or maybe they’re just testing the waters and compliance of the people currently elected, heck if I know.

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    To amend the United States Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by Congress and ratified by three-fourths of the states. The process is outlined in Article V of the Constitution.

    Congress: A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required

    Constitutional convention: Two-thirds of state legislatures must call for a convention

    Ratification: Three-fourths of state legislatures or conventions must ratify the amendment

    Each state legislature must vote on the amendment in an up-or-down vote

    State legislatures cannot change the language of the amendment

    This is DOA

    • AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously. It’s obviously abhorrent, but thankfully as of now there’s zero chance of it passing. Save your energy for the many things that warrant shock and disgust.

  • waywardninja@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    From the article:

    Ogles’ resolution is tailored specifically to permit Trump to serve a third term, but not to allow three out of the four living former presidents to serve third terms.

    It’s a Trump only privilege which, given the track record, could have been assumed, unfortunately.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 day ago

    What a frivolous waste of congressional speaking time. I thought these guys had real problems to solve? I thought Trump was gonna fix it all this time around? You’re telling me not even 1 week into his new term and he’s already thinking about how the job won’t be done in time?

    Conservatives are pathetic.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      On the other hand, better they do nothing than actuality successfully fucking everything up.

      • psud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The worry is that perhaps Trump is smarter than he appears, and all he’s doing is showing his followers that he’s still all about setting up a autocratic government which they’ll get to be the muscle for, ready to do a violent takeover the moment elections stop working (just like last time, but this time better armed and better organised)

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s basically what I’ve been posting on Social Media anytime shit like this happens.

      “How does this lower grocery prices?”

      Ask whenever the Right or Center is listening, keep the message on “Trump is distracting you from what he isn’t doing, but should.”

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Thank you for saying grocery instead of egg. So many people say eggs and it is going to age like milk when the bird flu recedes even though groceries will generally still be expensive otherwise.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If this fails, you can expect them to redefine what a “term” means. And if that fails they can simply cancel elections under “emergency” conditions and keep him in office for longer.

      … and if that fails, they can just say “too bad” and do whatever they want anyway because who’s going to stop them?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just want to point out that this is just one of the many many campaign promises he is trying to fulfill. Sure, it’s a big deal. But simply saying “conservatives are pathetic” is not only reactionary, it is wrong. Look at what is happening to immigrants. You might not see them as a problem, but conservatives do, and they are “solving” it.

      Just saying, this shit is way scarier this time around. They’re fuckin’ moving.

  • htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump is not exactly a spring chicken. He is one mild medical event to being in the history book.

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Great, than we end up with Vance aka the young, healthy, couch-fucking, monarchist who lacks Trump’s compulsive need for worship.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Vance used to be the face of Never Trump, which makes his actual motives a mystery. The best possibility would rely on him pulling a long con, but so would the worst possibility.

    • ATDA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      COVID nearly killed him and RFK is antivax sycophant. I’m not a betting man but…

  • DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    A constitutional amendment required 2/3s House and Senate AND 3/4 of states. And they don’t have that. This is more bullshit to distract.

    To amend the U.S. Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states). Alternatively, an amendment can be proposed by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures, but this method has never been used.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is more bullshit to distract.

      This is saying it louder for the people in the back. Musk’s Nazi Salute isn’t getting the message across? Okay, how about this?

      • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        They so desperatly want a hidden militia to come out of the woodwork and coup the country for them

        Those people are either dead from covid, too old to fight for their coup, or are just LARPers and actually aren’t interested in dying for a con man.

        • psud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The ones Trump let out of prison were willing to do violence, including killing police officers. They’re a credible threat.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That would also be an amendment to the Constitution.

        The last amendment that passed took over 200 years to get through the process.

      • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        the same amount,

        The United States Constitution Article V:

        The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    2 days ago

    “It is imperative that we provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the disastrous course set by the Biden administration,” Ogles said in a statement

    so Biden created a bad situation for him in 4 years, yet he thinks Trump needs 8 years to undo it. Sounds like a skill issue to me.

    • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why are y’all still fighting about this? Your farce of an election is over, what purpose does this ceaseless bickering serve?

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      59
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fuck you, that wasn’t why Trump won. It was because Dems offer nothing but the avoidance of something worse.

      I’m outraged at the genocide and voted for Biden anyway. People can be mad at Dems and demand better without being responsible for their failure.

      • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The American people failed.

        This was fucking advertised. This was chosen. This was voted for.

        Stupidest populous on earth.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m with you until the last sentence. Fewer than 50% of American voters voted for Trump.

        • TangoNoir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          How is any of this “chosen” when everything is gerrymandered and rigged?

          Our biggest fault was being the frog who stayed in the water while it was heating up. We have just slowly been giving up freedoms with a little fuss but not enough to matter. We need to learn to say no firmly and with conviction.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Any obstacles to electing someone else could have easily been overcome.

            If “Did Not Vote” was a candidate:

            This was completely preventable.

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Gerrymandering doesn’t exist in your presidential election.

            The majority of Americans supports - or at the very least is neutral towards - Trump. You can blame this on a lot of factors such as misinformation and lack of education but this doesn’t change the general attitude.

              • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                The electoral college has bias towards states with lower populations but it’s not gerrymandering.

                Gerrymandering is specifically drawing district borders to guarantee victory with a minority of votes.

                The US presidential election would be gerrymandered if some states decided to go through mitosis to get more electoral votes for their party.

            • Drusas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Something like 49% of eligible voters voted for Trump. And many eligible voters don’t vote. So no, factually, you are incorrect. A lot of people here are too poor to give a shit about politics and are completely unengaged.

          • Drusas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Anyone downvoting you is an idiot. This is exactly the situation the American people have been in.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The avoidance of all of this is probably the single most motivating thing in existence. Implying otherwise is strange.

        You don’t sleep in your actively burning home because none of the local hotels tickle your fancy.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Which is why I voted for the lady who refused to condemn genocide. What are you arguing?

          Dems are center right. They have been for a long time because of cold war propaganda and brainwashing. That doesn’t mean I won’t vote against fascism. It means we need better alternatives.

  • blackberry@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    'No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms," the amendment states. Former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all served two consecutive terms, and thus would be barred from being elected to a third term. But not Trump, who is the first president since Grover Cleveland in 1892 to be elected to a second, non-consecutive term.